Well, I don’t think he’s evil. But I think he dislikes
the American people, and this depresses us. The President […] is in the
position to be an extraordinarily effective teacher. […]He can influence our
behavior for good and ill tremendously.[…] If he tells us about our neighbors
in trouble, if he tells us to treat them better tomorrow, why, we’ll all try.
But[…]he’s taught us to resent the poor for not solving their own problems.
He’s taught us to like prosperous people better than unprosperous people. He could
make us so humane and optimistic with a single television appearance.–Kurt
Vonnegut on Richard Nixon, interviewed in Playboy Magazine, July 1973
The Constitution of the United States of America dictates that
a president must be at least 35 years of age and a “natural born citizen”.
Whether any other qualities are required and what those might be are left up to
us, the voters.
So what should the required trait(s) of our president be? A
minimum IQ level? A record of accomplishment in some field? A knack for
leadership, whatever that is? A roster of policies lifted from column A rather
than column B?
How about this: The one quality a president must have is a
love for every single American.
He or she must love the rich and the poor, the middle class
and the homeless, the white, black and brown, the bluebloods and the immigrants,
the liberals and the conservatives, the moderates and the fanatics, the free
and the imprisoned, the straight and the gay, male and female, young and old,
healthy and sick, Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, Bahai, atheist,
areligious, and Wiccan. The ones on billionaires’ row and the ones on death
row. The yahoos in MAGA caps and the housewives in hijabs. The ones who voted for
him and the ones who voted—and ran—against him. The president must be motivated
first, last, and only by an unconditional love for every specimen of Homo
Sapiens alive and breathing on American soil, and consider none of them as
the enemy. Why does this even need to be said? And yet evidently it does.
I am not an expert in recent American history, and of course
the human heart is not subject to an absolute analysis. But I would not be
surprised if this quality has endowed every president since, say, Herbert
Hoover onwards, with the probable exception of the alcoholic, resentful Richard
Nixon. Even those presidents whose policies appalled me or whose intelligence I
questioned didn’t cause me to think they actually disliked us.
Except, that is, for Nixon. And Donald Trump.
Our current president has contempt for large swaths of his
fellow countrymen, including but not limited to American Muslims, women,
Latinos, African-Americans, American P.O.W.s and immigrants. It makes one
wonder who’s left. I’m not even sure that this man, who, according to the
recently resigned U.K. ambassador to the U.S., “radiates insecurity”, loves
himself.
It’s fine to be angry. There is no end of things to be angry
about—global warming, murdered journalists, obscenely inequal incomes, to name
just three. But our leader must be angry for us. This president is angry
at us.
But don’t take it from me. Use your own eyes and ears. Or take it from recent essays by the
conservative intelligentsia, including Michael
Gerson’s, titled “Republican leaders are shilling for a bigot”, or Kathleen Parker’s
“Those who don’t condemn Trump’s racism are complicit in his bigotry”. To quote
Parker: “President Trump is a racist. And a sexist. And a xenophobic
nationalist. Among other things.”
And it is very dangerous for a people to be led by someone
who fundamentally hates them. Why would anyone with a choice allow that?
That is why we here in the Garden have moved from a “let the
next election handle this” point of view to something more like “we must get
rid of this guy by any constitutionally permitted means available”. We made a
mistake in 2016, my fellow Americans, when we assumed that whatever this fellow
was really like, at least he liked us.
After all, why else would the man want to be president? Just
so he could be mean?