My Favorite Jack London Story … Story

Consider Jack London’s “A Piece of Steak” – you’ve probably read it. It’s the one about the old boxer vs. the young boxer. It’s not my favorite Jack London story. It’s well-written, of course, but it seems to me that it suffers from predictability. Jack London really telegraphed his punches in that one, you might say. If I had to pick a favorite Jack London work, it would probably be his non-fiction around-the-world-in-a-sailboat tale, “Cruise of the Snark”. If you haven’t read it, check it out. It’s great fun.

So “A Piece of Steak” is not my favorite Jack London story, but my favorite Jack London story story is one about “A Piece of Steak”.

Before I proceed, I want you to do something. Assuming you’ve read “A Piece of Steak”, I want you to bring it to mind. It’s a story without very many characters in it. Try to remember who they are, and what part they played in the story. Retell the story to yourself as best you can … I’ll wait.

Ready?

Something like 35 years ago, I was in the break room of the office where I worked, eating lunch with a couple of my coworkers—let’s call them Alice and Bob (We were all computer programmers, after all). For some reason I have long forgotten, I mentioned the Jack London story. Alice said she’d never read it. Bob said he had read it in high school, and proceeded to recap the story for Alice, as follows: On the night before a big match, the old boxer makes a terrible mistake. At suppertime, there is one small piece of steak that his wife has cooked for him—the rest of their meager fair consists of bread and gravy. The old boxer, seeing the hungry look in the eyes of his three small children, cuts the steak up into three pieces, and gives a piece to each child. The terrible consequence of the old boxer’s selflessness is that in the ring the next evening, he doesn’t have the strength to stand up to the merciless pummeling of the young boxer, and he loses the match.

That’s how I remembered the story, sort of. The thing was, I didn’t remember the boxer and his wife having any children, nor did I remember there being any actual steak at all in the story.

Curious as to whose memory of the story was right, I went to the library a few days later and looked it up. Turns out, Bob and I were both wrong, though my recollection was perhaps somewhat more accurate. The boxer and his wife do have one child, a son, but there is no steak, as the family can’t afford it, and as there is no steak, the boxer doesn’t give his steak to his son. In fact, the boy is sent to bed without any supper, and the boxer eats all the bread and gravy himself as his wife looks on. It is not an act of selflessness that condemns the old boxer to defeat—it is simply his circumstances.

Here’s what I knew about Bob at the time: He had recently married a divorced woman with three children.

I ran into Alice a decade or so later, and asked about Bob. She said the last she’d heard, he was living in Florida under an assumed name, on the run from the IRS.

So maybe “A Piece of Steak” is not my favorite Jack London story—but it is a story that people relate to in different and interesting ways, which is pretty great. How did you remember it?

Crime and Punishment, Revisited

I have a confession to make. Back in the 90’s I got a ticket for speeding in a school zone. The ticket was $210 dollars. It wasn’t like I couldn’t afford it, but it was enough to sting. I have done some illegal things in my life, but I never felt particularly bad about any of them, except for that one. It was just stupid. I wasn’t paying attention, and it would have been truly horrible if I’d injured or killed a kid on their way to school. So I paid the fine and figured I deserved the pain.

However, in light of recent events, I’ve been rethinking my feelings about that “crime”, and I’ve realized that I got it completely wrong. First of all, nobody got hurt. It was a victimless crime, if ever there was one. All of the kids made it safe and sound to school that day, and I’m sure it was a great day for them—it was probably pizza day in the cafeteria or something.

Second, it occurs to me now that those cops were out to get me. Otherwise, why would they have had that cop with his lidar on the exact route that I always took to work, on the exact day and hour I always went to work? There were thousands of other drivers speeding in school zones that day who didn’t get tickets. What about them? They don’t talk about them, because it was me they were after all along.

Everyone speeds. Everyone does it. But when I do it, I get a ticket for $210, and I didn’t even run over any kids. Not one kid. Okay, so if you run over a kid, then maybe you should have to pay $210—but why should I have to pay for kids I didn’t run over? I mean, if you think about it, they should pay me for all the kids I didn’t run over. They should pay me $210 for each kid that had a great day at school that day, ate really great pizza for lunch, and grew up to be a productive member of society because of me. That makes more sense.

Did you ever hear about that guy Schindler? I heard about this guy Schindler. I heard he saved some kids from the Nazis. Now, I know I’m not supposed to say anything nice about Nazis, so I’m not going to say it. I’m not going to say that whatever you think about the Nazis, they were strong. When they wanted to take a country, they took it, and no one could stop them. I mean, it would take, like, a hundred countries to stop them—that’s how strong they were. Very strong. So Schindler, they say he saved some kids from the Nazis. I don’t know why he had to save them, I guess these were the bad Nazis. I guess some Nazis were bad and didn’t like kids or something. Anyway, Schindler saved some kids from the bad Nazis, and what did they do? They planted a tree for him. Think about that. Schindler saves a few kids, and he gets a tree—I don’t run over any kids at all, even though I could have—I could have run over so many more kids than Schindler ever saved from Nazis in his whole life, but I didn’t—and I have to pay $250 for not running over any. If they planted a tree for Schindler, they should plant a forest for me.

But then I thought, what the hell do I want with a forest? And so I said, “What the hell do I want with a forest?” And they said, “Sir, you can use the wood.” “What for?” “Sir, you can make books out of the wood.” Did you know that? Did you know books are made out of wood? I know more about books than anyone, but I didn’t know books were made out of wood. It’s true. And then I said, “The Bible is a book, right?” And they said, “Sir, we never saw anyone catch on to books so fast! You could be a publisher!” But I said, “The Bible is a book, right?” And they said, “Yes, sir, the Bible is a book.” And I said “So I could take all those trees and make Bibles.” “Yes, sir. That’s genius, Sir. The Bible is the best-selling book in history. You could make a lot of money, Sir.” And I said, “What’s on the cover of the Bible?” And they said, “Sir, usually it just says The Bible on the cover.” And I said, “If they’re going to use my trees to make Bibles, I want my face on the cover.” And they said, “That’s genius Sir. You will sell more Bibles than anyone has ever seen.” And I said, “And a full spread of me naked in the middle.” And they said, “That’s genius, Sir.” And I said

In Case of Emergency

A man wearing the life jacket he retrieved from under his seat stands in the open door of the airplane looking out serenely. He is in his thirties, perhaps, neatly, but comfortably, dressed—a perfect “casual (but not too casual) Friday” outfit. The look on his face brings to mind Juliet telling Romeo “Parting is such sweet sorrow.” Yes, he must leave the plane soon, but first, he’s taking a moment to appreciate the beautiful sunrise. We can deduce that he’s looking at a sunrise from the warm, yellow-orange light that illuminates him. He’s not in any hurry—there’s no one inside the plane behind him screaming or pushing to get out, and the plane isn’t heaving or rocking—not in the least—the waters of this ocean (we assume it’s the North Atlantic) must be remarkably calm this morning. He’s got all the time in the world—why not take in the view before plunging into the icy waters?

There’s no telling what he’s thinking. Maybe he’s wondering about the three other passengers on the plane. There was a young woman and a little girl—no doubt mother and daughter. Where was the father? Was the mother taking her daughter back to him—or fleeing him? Probably not fleeing him—she looked too happy—both of them looked too happy—to be having that kind of trauma in their lives. Yes, he’s certain they were going home—probably had a wonderful visit with grandma (too bad daddy had to work!) and now they’re going home. When he saw them at gate, he smiled and waved at the little girl, and she smiled and waved back.

How remarkably calm those two were when the cabin depressurized and the oxygen bags fell from the ceiling! The young woman pulled the mask downward sharply, then placed it over her own face. The little girl, who couldn’t be more than five or six, clearly took after her mother—showed no fear whatsoever—even smiled up at her mother as her mother helped her with her own mask.

Where were they now? Possibly floating off into the sunrise on one of the emergency slides that could be detached and used as a life raft. Maybe the one other passenger on the plane—the flight attendant—was with them. What a sharp-looking blue uniform she wore! How impressed the little girl was when the flight attendant walked by them at the gate. Maybe that encounter will inspire the little girl (if she survives) to become a flight attendant one day!

It’s time to go. He pulls the cord on the life jacket, but as far as we can tell, nothing happens. He blows on the tubes, but that seems to have no effect either. Is that a problem? It doesn’t seem to bother him. The life jacket might already be inflated—maybe he already inflated it, and forgot. It’s really hard to tell.

As he stands there, perhaps wondering whether or not his life jacket is inflated, darkness slowly falls and he fades from view. Maybe it was a sunset he was looking at, and not a sunrise.

(A description of “The Man in the Life Jacket” scene from the animated short “In Case of Emergency” shown to passengers by Condor Airlines prior to departing Frankfort airport for Portland International.)

Fascinations

“There is a queftion in natural hiftory that has, in efpecial

manner, folicited from me thefe obfervations. I mean the

queftion concerning the fafcinating faculty, which has been

afcribed to different kinds of American ferpents. It is my

intention to examine this queftion, in the memoir which I now

prefent to the Philofophical Society”

.

.

–Journal of Natural Philosophy, Chemistry, & the Arts (1804)

.

.

People fascinate me. It seems to me that the most ordinary-seeming person, if pressed (and if they were being honest) would soon reveal themselves to be composed of thousands of odd little stories, and despite the fact the each of these stories has its own idiosyncratic shape, at once elbowy and intestinal, they are all interwoven and fitted so seemlessly as to construct the singular one we see standing before us. People are like Dr. Who’s “Tardis”: bigger on the inside than the outside.

Cats fascinate me. If a human were a very complex sort of soup, a cat would be a spoonful of that soup. Everything in that spoon contains a little bit of what’s in the pot. One generally does not drink soup straight out of the pot—one consumes it a spoonful of time (I’m not suggesting you eat your cat—this is a metaphor, okay?) Why? I guess you could say soup by the spoonful is a little less “in your face” than by the potful. So I can look at (and get to know) a cat, and feel like I’ve had a taste of the near-infinite complexity of what humanity is made of.

Since I call myself a novelist, you may find it strange that novels don’t fascinate me. Don’t get me wrong—I’ve read novels that interested me, that awed me, that inspired me, that changed my life. But I don’t think I’ve ever read a novel that fascinated me—it’s a different sort of engagement. For me, reading a great novel is like watching a trainwreck in slow motion—truly, I can’t look away—but I’m too immersed in it to engage with it intellectually in the way that defines “fascination” for me.

On the other hand, short stories (good ones) do fascinate me. A great short story (Nathaniel Hawthorne’s “Feathertop” or “The Black Veil”, Guy de Maupassant’s “Butterball”, Isak Dinesen’s “Babette’s Feast” (or just about any of the stories in 7 Gothic Tales) to name just a few). To read a great short story is to see the world in a grain of sand. Yet another “Tardis” of sorts. I guess it’s the oddly pleasurable necessity of pulling so much out of myself to fill in the blanks that makes reading a great short story such a different experience than reading a great novel.

My fascination with stories isn’t limited to those that are written down. Stories people tell me fascinate me. People probably wouldn’t tell me their stories, if they had any idea how much I read into them.

Dreams fascinate me. Analyzing a dream is like planting and watering a strange, gem-like seed that inevitably blooms into an even stranger flower. I’ve had dreams I’ve thought about for nearly my whole life. When I was little (5? 6?), I dreamt I was attacked by a skeleton wearing army boots. My father saved me by tying the skeleton’s shoelaces together. That image of my father—so deft and fearless—has stayed with me my whole life. No question it is an image that is infinitely bigger on the inside than the outside.

Love fascinates me. If anything is bigger on the inside than the outside, it’s love.

Hate doesn’t fascinate me. If anything is smaller on the inside than it is on the outside it’s hate. Hate is nearly the ultimate simplifier. I say nearly, because I suppose the prize would have to go to the black hole—a thing that pulls everything in and squeezes it down to  a “nothing” that, somehow, makes the black hole ever more powerful. Now that I think about it, maybe hate is even better at that.

Gosh, I feel like I’m done, but I don’t want to end on that note. What else fascinates me? There’s gotta be one more thing. I don’t know—Sumo wrestling, maybe.

Then Come, in Order of Decreasing Frequency

Then come, in order of decreasing frequency

The beating of the pulse,

The chirping of crickets or cicadas,

The rustling of leaves,

The crackling noises of the telephone,

The measured tread of a troop of soldiers, and

Various strange noises, which patients have likened to

The meeting of railway trains under a roof on which

Heavy rain was falling,

The rumbling of a receding cart,

The shuffling of a pack of cards,

And the rolling of thunder.

–Adapted from an article about tinnitus in the Scientific American magazine

Volume 104 (March 25, 1911)

NOstrils (by Jonathan)

We all have our reasons for looking at the title of a book, maybe reading the blurb and a few sample pages, and saying, nope, not for me. Maybe it’s a genre you have no interest in. Maybe you can’t stand reading a book written in the present tense. I know a guy who refuses to read any book with the words “Billionaire”, “Christmas”, or “Daddy” in the title. Then there’s the Bechdel test, and there’s people who won’t ready anything written by a dead white man. Me, I’ll read almost anything (or at least, give it a try), but I do have my one hard-and-fast rule. I call it

THE SNIFF TEST

I don’t want to read about nostrils. If, by the end of chapter 1, nostrils are already flaring, I’m done. If nostrils are flaring while eyes are glaring, I’m double done. And why can’t a character just smell things anymore? Why must we be informed that the aroma of his mother’s cooking made love to his nostrils, or the smell of the restaurant’s salmon special swam up her nostrils to spawn, or that the sweet pong of Panzer exhaust blitzkrieged his nostrils?

I will never read Cordwainer Smith’s sci-fi novel “Norstrilia”. I know it has nothing to do with nostrils, but it’s just too close. It even bothered me that the ship in “Alien” was “The Nostromo”, but that was a movie, so I give it a pass. Gogol’s “The Nose” is fine—I have nothing against noses—I’m not crazy. Nor do I have a problem with septums, because they aren’t over-used like nostrils are. I think the only time I’ve ever seen the word septum in a novel is when it’s about a cokehead who doesn’t have one. Now there’s an opportunity there for the discerning writer. Consider, for example, the sentence: “The smell of her perfume set my septum vibrating like a prank handshake buzzer.” Isn’t that so much better than that old nostril bit, worn thinner than a cokehead’s septum?

And philtrums—I love philtrums. You want me to read your book, title it “The Philtrum”.

Anyway, No Nostrils. That’s my rule. My one-and-only rule.*

What’s yours?

*Okay, I confess, I’m the guy I know who would refuse to read a book titled “My Billionaire Christmas Daddy.” I make no apologies.

The Two Types of Great Writer (by Jonathan)

I believe there are two types of great writers in this world: those who seem to have been born with an inexplicable knack for it (Jane Austen, Isaak Dinesen, Yukio Mishima, Mark Twain, to name a very few), and the rest of us.

If you are human, and your eyes are open, and your heart is open, and you have the temerity to write honestly about your experience, you can write something well worth reading.

About thirty years ago, I was judge of a short story contest sponsored by a community college. The record will show (if the record still exists) that there were three persons on the panel, and I was none of them. The reality is, I was all three (and that’s a story for another time). I awarded the first-place prize to a woman who wrote a story about a woman who was so envious of the love and attention the family dog got from her husband and her children, that she began turning into a dog herself.

I heard that at the awards ceremony, she said she hadn’t submitted the story with any hope of winning—in fact, she had only submitted it because submitting a story to the contest was the assignment of the week for her English class. She said getting the award changed the way she felt about herself—that for the first time in her adult life, she felt like what she had to say—how she saw the world—was significant. I don’t know if she continued to write (or if she even wanted to), but I hope that feeling of pride in her own voice stayed with her for as long as my memory of her remarkable short story has.

Those of us who want to write, but weren’t born with the inexplicable knack, can still be great. We all have something no one else has: our own experience and our own voice.

I’m not encouraging everyone to write. I’m not one of those who believes that everyone should write, just like everyone should brush their teeth. But if you do want to write, and what’s holding you back is that you don’t think you’re any good at it, or you don’t have anything to say, I beg to differ.

Here’s some tips for the beginner, which you can trust absolutely as having come directly to you from a beginner:

If you can’t think of anything else to write, try writing yourself a letter. Write as if you were your own BFF, and hadn’t seen or heard from yourself in a year, and you want to catch you up on everything that has happened in your life. Remember that honesty is key here.

If you want to write a story: Explain nothing, just tell the story. Don’t make your characters explain anything, just let them speak. For the advanced beginner: Try coming at things sideways, just for grins.

If you want to write a scene: Get the scene in general in your head, then imagine that somewhere in your scene, you have hidden a beautiful gem for your readers. Take a long walk and think about what that gem might be, and where it might be. Keep walking until you find it.

If you want to write a novel: Join a writers group. Don’t think of your fellow writers as critics of your work, think of them as people who will show you how your writing affects people. Remember that the first priority of a writers group is to encourage people to write. Take criticism humbly and with an open mind. It’s bound to hurt a little bit, sometimes, but you can handle it. Give criticism kindly. Perhaps the best advice I can give concerning criticism in a writers group is, it’s often less hurtful and more productive to say “Tell me what you were going for here” than “This doesn’t work.”

One last piece of advice: Read Isaak Dinesen’s “Seven Gothic Tales”, and Freud’s “Psychopathology of Everyday Life”, and Vonnegut’s “Long Walk to Forever.”

Finally, what some might say in anger or frustration, I say with love: If you’ve got something to say, say it.

In Praise of the Live Performance

I was having a cup of coffee with my dad, and we were talking about theater, and he asked me what my favorite play was. Turned out to be a tough question, because, when thinking about the plays I have seen, and which one I liked best, I realized that the experience of watching a live performance often meant more to me than the play itself. Let me give you an example:

When I was fifteen or sixteen, my aunt took me to see a production of the play Equus as performed by the Skokie Illinois Community Theater. If you’ve never heard about or seen Equus, well, it was huge in the seventies. The play is about a psychiatrist who is treating a young man, Alan Strang, who has committed a horrible and inexplicable crime—the blinding of six horses with a metal spike. There is a critical scene in Equus where a young woman, Jill Mason, attempts to seduce Alan in the stables where they both work. Alan, who, for complicated reasons, feels he is being watched and judged by the horses, is unable to get an erection. In the play as written, the actors are to perform this scene in the nude.

I imagine most community theaters would find a way to fig-leaf that particular scene—not the Skokie Community Theater—they went for the “full Monty”. That’s pretty gutsy, for a community theater, I think, and kudos to them. Unfortunately, they ran into a little snag. The actor portraying Alan had exactly the opposite problem that Alan has in the play. Let me not fig-leaf the situation: he had a raging hard-on.

The show must go on, as they say, but the dialog between Alan and Jill, where she tries to comfort him about his failure, was rendered rather comic.

On the way out of the theater, my aunt and I were preceded by two elderly women, and I overheard their conversation, which centered on the actor’s unfortunate difficulty in that scene. How remarkable it was, one of the women said, that he was able to keep right on going and didn’t miss a line.

“He was so brave!” the other said.

So is Equus my favorite play? Oy. There are so many better plays. And yet, perhaps the best line I ever heard in a theater was one delivered by a sympathetic elderly lady after the curtain dropped.

Every live performance is two stories in one: the story told in the script, and the story of the people midwifing that script to life right before your very eyes. A rich, strange world is born in that intersection.

I could tell you about the time I went to see “Goose and Tomtom” at the Undermain Theater in Dallas, Texas, and got to walk around in a monster alien’s shoes, or the time I was on a first date with the woman I would marry, and I took her to see “The Castle”—but those are stories for another time—let’s just say that when people go out on stage and give it their all, magic can happen.

I hope you are thinking to yourself now, “I haven’t been to see a play in a long time—maybe I should go.” Yes, you should—but let me give you a suggestion. Don’t go to the big theater in town where they do slick productions of the most popular plays of this and yester year. Find a small, hardworking theater group that is doing something dicey. If you’re going to go see a live performance, go see one that will surprise you.

So go. Be brave.