On Stockton Rush and Donald Trump

A few weeks ago I watched the fascinating and horrifying Netflix documentary Titan: The OceanGate Disaster. It deconstructed the history of the Titan, a tiny submersible vehicle designed and built by the entrepreneur-inventor Stockton Rush, for the purpose of taking wealthy tourists more than two miles from the surface of the North Atlantic down to the seabed to view the wreck of the Titanic, at $250,000 a pop. It had an experimental carbon-fiber hull, and was navigated with the use of a modified video-game controller.

It all worked for several trips until, on June 18, 2023, it didn’t. It imploded partway through its descent, killing its occupants, including Mr. Rush.

The craft was not “ill-fated” in the sense of being unlucky. The event is more accurately described as a tragedy, in the classical sense. The ocean, the craft, and Mr. Rush’s colleagues and crew had all been telling him that something was wrong and that disaster was just a matter of time. But Rush was determined not to listen.

Boeing Corporation, initially a partner in the project, prudently backed away out of safety concerns. More than one expert questioned his use of carbon-fiber as the hull material instead of the standard titanium, as well as its oblong shape instead of the more durable sphere. Rush ignored the acoustic evidence his own staff carefully documented: the pops and cracks which indicated a microscopic fraying of the carbon-fiber material, which got louder as the capsule went deeper and was subjected to more pressure. To passengers in his craft, he dismissed the scary-sounding pops as a normal “seasoning” process. He conducted a lab experiment in which a model was subjected to a pressure equivalent the ocean at the depth of the Titanic. The model collapsed. Steps were taken to improve the material…but it was not retested to see if those improvements worked. Most importantly, whenever members of his own staff raised issues, he responded by firing them or bullying them into quitting.

Rush had several motives for ignoring the truth. A submersible built of carbon fiber is much cheaper to build and transport than one made of titanium. Starting over with a new design would have meant having to confront unhappy investors, and postponing those $250k-a-seat excursions for years. And it would have been a blow to the man’s pride. He was the maverick, the genius who had no time for the establishment’s experts. He knew better than they.

The Titan story crossed my mind this week when I read about Donald Trump’s firing of Erika McEntarfer, the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. He fired her because the Bureau had reported an unexpectedly weak job market for this past June. He claimed that those statistics were “rigged,” without providing any evidence. Of course, the bad news was necessarily rigged, since Trump is president, Trump is a genius businessman, and therefore any bad economic news must be false news.

Now, I’m not an economist and I don’t know what’s going to happen to our economy. So far it’s been a sturdy little craft, holding up surprisingly well to the rough seas of absurdly steep tariffs applied (then lifted, then re-applied) to capriciously selected nations and products, and the gutting of longstanding federal institutions charged with keeping an eye out for financial malfeasance.

But the firing or bullying of bona-fide experts like Ms. McEntarfer and Jerome Powell, the chairman of the Federal Reserve, makes me very nervous. They are economists, and appear to know what they’re doing. I don’t trust Donald Trump, a businessman who has grown rich by making real-estate deals, raking in the profits where there were any, and expertly playing U.S. bankruptcy law to leave someone else holding the bag when there weren’t, to understand reality and act in a way that won’t lead to a global economic implosion.  

Of course the comparison between Stockton Rush and Donald Trump is imperfect. Rush believed in his version of reality enough to put his own life on the line, and he paid the price for it. I can’t figure out whether Trump actually believes what he says and tweets, or whether he cares, or whether he even bothers to make a mental distinction between fact and his own fiction. This is, after all, the man who praised the use of “truthful hyperbole” as a sales tactic in The Art of the Deal, and whose one-time press secretary Kellyanne Conway memorably coined the phrase “alternative facts” when confronted with, well, lies about the attendance figures at Trump’s first inauguration.

Another difference is that, unlike Rush, Trump won’t have to suffer the consequences of his recklessness. No matter what happens, he’s never going to have to worry about where his next meal is coming from. But as jobs disappear and prices of imported products and materials rise, millions of Americans and billions of people around the world might.


Photo of Stockton Rush provided by OceanGate via Wikimedia, license available at OceanGate, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0, photo available at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stockton_Rush_(cropped).png

Photo of Donald Trump provided by Fulton County Sheriff’s Office

For subscribers: listen to A Silly Old Story

Dear subscriber to Garden of Eaton: Yesterday we published a post about our audio book(let) of Gerolamo Rovetta’s short story “A Silly Old Story,” but for some reason the little “play” button didn’t make it into the post, or into the email that went out with it. But now it’s there, and we invite you to listen at https://gardenofeaton.home.blog/2025/08/02/listen-to-the-latest-episode-of-verbal-exchange-a-reading-of-gerolamo-rovettas-a-silly-old-story/ . Thanks for your interest! — Steve Eaton

Listen to the Latest Episode of Verbal Exchange: A Reading of Gerolamo Rovetta’s “A Silly Old Story”

In the latest episode of our podcast Verbal Exchange, we read our translation of Gerolamo Rovetta’s hilarious story of a reluctant duellist, “A Silly Old Story” (“Storiella Vecchia,” 1898). Listen to it here, or wherever you stream your podcasts from.

It’s also available in print form, here:

Either way…enjoy!

The musical theme for this episode is “L’inno di Garibaldi” (“Garibaldi’s Hymn”), words by Garibaldi-Luigi Mercantini, music by Alessio Olivieri, sung by Edoardo Ferrari Fontana. Provided for non-commercial purposes by the Canadian government archives at https://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/m2/f7/17139.mp3. License at: https://web.archive.org/web/20250620161232/https://library-archives.canada.ca/eng/Pages/terms-conditions.aspx#a1

The Absurd Man of Alcatraz

Can you believe that President Trump wants to convert Alcatraz back into a federal prison?[….]It is possible that Mr. Trump had “Escape From Alcatraz” on his mind when he declared on social media on Sunday that he had directed federal agencies to rebuild and reopen Alcatraz to serve as “a symbol of Law, Order, and JUSTICE.”—”Alcatraz as a Prison? Tourists Say Trump Is on His Own Island.” New York Times, May 5, 2025

EDITOR’S NOTE: Quantum physicists on our staff have discovered the particular parallel universe (#8,217) where everything turns out exactly the way we want it. Our reporter on the Ideal Universe desk filed this transcript of Donald Trump’s inspection of the newly restored Alcatraz penitentiary.

Place: The new federal prison, Alcatraz Island

Time: the near future

PARK RANGER: Welcome to Alcatraz, Mr. President! We’re so honored to give you and Melania an exclusive preview! I hope you like what we’ve done…

PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: Don’t worry about me, Warden, I won’t make any trouble! I just want to serve my time all peaceful-like so I can go back to my family.  Ha ha, I always wanted to say that, I should have been in the movies! Actually, maybe you saw it…Home Alone 2….

RANGER: I’m not the warden sir, actually I’m with the Park Service…

POTUS: What Park Service? I thought we eliminated…

RANGER: Yes sir, Alcatraz used to belong to the park service. Technically I’m a former park ranger since DOGE cut my position…Now if you and Melania will just follow me through these extra-heavy cement-filled steel doors, I want to show you where the most dangerous felons will be housed…

POTUS: Hey, what happened to my Secret Services?

RANGER: Oh, don’t worry, sir. They’re in the visitor’s lounge enjoying our signature cocktail, “The Nightstick.” We’ll call an Uber to make sure they get home safe. Now here you see an example of one of our maximum security cells….

POTUS: For the worst of the worst!

RANGER: Exactly right, sir. I’ll just slide open the bars so you all can step inside and get a closer look…

MELANIA: Eww…I’ll just stand outside…

POTUS: Nice! They got their own toilet, a cot, some kind of steel shelf or something…better than they deserve, really! Kind of cramped though, it looked bigger when Clint Eastwood was here…hey, they even got books! The Holy Bible and the Art of the Deal, my favorites! Does everyone get these?

RANGER: Well, not everyone, no…Now I’ll just show you how these locks close…[CLICK]

POTUS: You don’t scare me, you lousy screw! They ain’t built the joint yet that can hold me! Ha ha, I always wanted to say that, too! Hey, when do we get lunch around here, I’m getting hungry…

RANGER: Lunch is at one o’clock, sir. I believe today we’re featuring baloney sandwiches, skim milk and…canned peaches for dessert.

MELANIA: Eww…

POTUS: Don’t wait for me, doll. I’m just no good, see? Find someone who can treat you good, like you deserve, ha ha!

MELANIA: Whatever! Are we done yet? I’m supposed to try on an outfit at 2:00…

RANGER: Yes, Madame First Lady, the exit is right this way…

POTUS: Hey guys, where are you going!? Let me outta here!

MELANIA: You worked for the Park Service? I bet you can tell me all about rescues and wildfires and grizzly bears and exciting stuff like that!

RANGER: Yes, I loved that job…

POTUS: Lemme out! I’m innocent, I tell ya! I been framed! Oh, why doesn’t anyone believe me!? [The sound of footsteps recedes into the distance] So where’s my baloney sandwich?

My Favorite Jack London Story … Story

Consider Jack London’s “A Piece of Steak” – you’ve probably read it. It’s the one about the old boxer vs. the young boxer. It’s not my favorite Jack London story. It’s well-written, of course, but it seems to me that it suffers from predictability. Jack London really telegraphed his punches in that one, you might say. If I had to pick a favorite Jack London work, it would probably be his non-fiction around-the-world-in-a-sailboat tale, “Cruise of the Snark”. If you haven’t read it, check it out. It’s great fun.

So “A Piece of Steak” is not my favorite Jack London story, but my favorite Jack London story story is one about “A Piece of Steak”.

Before I proceed, I want you to do something. Assuming you’ve read “A Piece of Steak”, I want you to bring it to mind. It’s a story without very many characters in it. Try to remember who they are, and what part they played in the story. Retell the story to yourself as best you can … I’ll wait.

Ready?

Something like 35 years ago, I was in the break room of the office where I worked, eating lunch with a couple of my coworkers—let’s call them Alice and Bob (We were all computer programmers, after all). For some reason I have long forgotten, I mentioned the Jack London story. Alice said she’d never read it. Bob said he had read it in high school, and proceeded to recap the story for Alice, as follows: On the night before a big match, the old boxer makes a terrible mistake. At suppertime, there is one small piece of steak that his wife has cooked for him—the rest of their meager fair consists of bread and gravy. The old boxer, seeing the hungry look in the eyes of his three small children, cuts the steak up into three pieces, and gives a piece to each child. The terrible consequence of the old boxer’s selflessness is that in the ring the next evening, he doesn’t have the strength to stand up to the merciless pummeling of the young boxer, and he loses the match.

That’s how I remembered the story, sort of. The thing was, I didn’t remember the boxer and his wife having any children, nor did I remember there being any actual steak at all in the story.

Curious as to whose memory of the story was right, I went to the library a few days later and looked it up. Turns out, Bob and I were both wrong, though my recollection was perhaps somewhat more accurate. The boxer and his wife do have one child, a son, but there is no steak, as the family can’t afford it, and as there is no steak, the boxer doesn’t give his steak to his son. In fact, the boy is sent to bed without any supper, and the boxer eats all the bread and gravy himself as his wife looks on. It is not an act of selflessness that condemns the old boxer to defeat—it is simply his circumstances.

Here’s what I knew about Bob at the time: He had recently married a divorced woman with three children.

I ran into Alice a decade or so later, and asked about Bob. She said the last she’d heard, he was living in Florida under an assumed name, on the run from the IRS.

So maybe “A Piece of Steak” is not my favorite Jack London story—but it is a story that people relate to in different and interesting ways, which is pretty great. How did you remember it?

What to Give the Summer that Has Everything

Summer is made for running away, and this summer in particular is made for running away in mind as well as body. Tariffs? What tariffs? Deportations? What deportations? Here are the perfect accompaniments for the beach, picnic table, plane flight, or motel room:  

What’s an indolent, pleasure-loving Italian baron to do when the money runs out? Find out in The Priest’s Hat, Emilio De Marchi’s granddaddy of all crime thrillers, first published in 1887, now translated into English by Steve Eaton and Cinzia Russi, available on Amazon ($9.99 Kindle, $20.00 paperback). And then listen for free to our podcast about the true crime that inspired the novel. (Search for “the Priest’s Hat podcast” to find it on your platform of choice).

What happens when an idealistic young man, railroaded into jail for a crime he didn’t commit, shares a jail cell with a hardened criminal who provides him with a way out? Get the inside story from the lawman who tracks him down in Jonathan Eaton’s new western adventure, Peter Pegg, Outlaw, by One Who Knew Him, ($4.99 Kindle, $14.99 paperback).  And listen to the author read selections from the book and discuss his period research in our recent podcast (search “Peter Pegg Outlaw podcast” to find it on Spotify, PodBean, YouTube, TuneIn, or Apple podcasts.)

 You’re the sheriff responsible for protecting a tiny Western postapocalyptic town from roving bandit armies, gigantic people-eating ticks, and autonomous orbiting nuclear weapons. But those dangers are nothing compared to the beautiful stranger who appears from nowhere.  Find out who she really is in Jonathan Eaton’s sci-fi epic The Prairie Martian, ($4.99 Kindle, $12.99 paperback).

Pick one, or all three. We guarantee you’ll reach September a happier person!

In Which We Interview an Outlaw Author

My brother, the author Jonathan Eaton, recently released a new novel, Peter Pegg, Outlaw, by One Who Knew Him. This uproariously entertaining tale completes the trilogy of ‘Outlaw’ novels, along with A Good Man for an Outlaw, and Outlaws and Worse.

Jonathan was kind enough to visit the Verbal Exchange studio located somewhere in the Garden of Eaton (okay, it was actually our mom’s house), where we had a wide-ranging conversation about the novel and the series. I invite you to listen to the podcast of our conversation on tuneIn, Spotify, Apple podcasts, YouTube, or podbean, as part of my Verbal Exchange podcast series. We talk about how to gain admission to a frontier circus if you don’t have any money (or scruples), how to get shot by a dead man, how to negotiate with a stubborn editor, and how a perfectly nice kid becomes a deadly outlaw. Enjoy!

(And a shout out to our longtime loyal reader Bette, who is recovering from an operation. Hang in there, kid!)

Never Again, or Again and Again?

The time is long past to argue over the semantics of terms like “ethnic cleansing” and “genocide.”

You can call what is happening now in Gaza by whatever term pleases you. The terminology doesn’t change the fact that the Israeli Defense Forces, under the leadership of Benjamin Netanyahu, are herding the Palestinian population back and forth within the narrow borders of the Gaza Strip, as they turn entire cities, hospitals, schools, and apartment buildings included, to rubble. Forty or fifty thousand people have already been killed. Aid–food, water, medicine–has been shut off and children are starving and dying of preventable diseases.

And all of this is carried out under the now ludicrously phony aim of “getting the hostages back.” Netanyahu is now speaking of an even more aggressive ground campaign, with military occupation to follow. He seems to lack either the desire or the intellectual capacity to formulate any course of action other than inflicting more death and suffering on the Palestinian people, using all the 21st-century weapons and technology at his disposal.

This is becoming one of Western civilization’s great atrocities. It will be compared by historians to events like the massacre of Armenians by Turkey in 1915–with the difference that this time, it is being carried out by a close ally of the United States, and with the whole revolting spectacle graphically exposed to the world, day after day. But the historical perspective is no consolation to Palestinian parents watching their child starve to death, or to a Palestinian child whose parents lie under the rubble of an apartment building.

Every Israeli, every Jew, every Christian, every American, every human being with eyes and a heart should be appalled at what is happening in Gaza at the moment. It is absolutely wrong. And it is unnecessary. The IDF’s current strategy has no plausible rationale other than to keep Benjamin Netanyahu in power, out of jail, and to forestall the consequences of his own corruption and his security forces’ bungled handling of the horrific October 7, 2023 attack by Hamas on Israeli civilians.

A permanent, just solution aside, Israel can pull out of Gaza now, let humanitarian aid and humanitarian workers in, use its abundant military and logistical resources to seal off its border with Gaza, and employ its vaunted intelligence services to keep an eye on Hamas and to continue to pick off its leadership, without blowing up entire hospitals and residential communities.

What Israel is doing is wrong, and no accusations of antisemitism or anti-Zionism, whether valid or self-serving, make it right. The United States should use all of its economic and diplomatic resources to make Israel stop. And we the American people must make it politically unfeasible for our government to do anything else.

10 Memorable Movie (Going) Moments

I’m going to share ten personally memorable movie experiences of mine with you today…though not all of these movies were themselves memorable. If you have a movie memory you’d like to share, please leave it in the comments.

It’s 1967. I’m eight years old, sitting in one of Denton, Texas’ two single-screen movie theaters, watching A Guide for the Married Man, starring Walter Matthau and Robert Morse. It was probably some mediocre Hollywood producer’s idea of a smart, racy sex comedy. I can think of no reason I would have been sitting there, other than it was a hot summer afternoon, and that was what was playing.

It was an awful movie, but it was also memorable—literally, since I clearly remember two things about it, half a century later.

First: in a movie that was essentially a series of sketches, I can remember only one scene: Walter Matthau, as the wise old lecher, is instructing a naïve young Robert Morse on what to do if he’s caught having an affair: “deny, deny, deny,” no matter how much smoke the gun is emitting. Then we see Matthau’s character at home in bed with a girlfriend, as his wife unexpectedly returns home and catches them in the act. As the wife tears into the husband, the girl calmly gets up and starts to get dressed, and Matthau starts making the bed. He doesn’t understand why his wife is upset…nothing’s going on. The girl? What girl? The girlfriend gets her purse and leaves. Matthau continues to patiently deny everything and finishes making the bed. Finally the wife looks at her placid husband and the spotless bedroom, hesitates…and then admits that maybe she just dreamed the whole thing. As a cinematic illustration of “gaslighting,” it surpasses even Gaslight.

Secondly, and more importantly, I was struck by the funky, infectious theme song, written by John Williams and performed by The Turtles. It was stuck in my head for the next fifty years. It took the development of something called The Internet before I got to listen to that song a second time, and…it still rocks.

Still Denton,1967. My little brother and I are watching Bonnie and Clyde, the romanticized, revisionist version of the bank robbers’ story, starring Warren Beatty and Faye Dunaway. It‘s a big event: the real Bonnie and Clyde had committed some of their robberies and murders in and around Denton, and the film itself was shot partly in the vicinity. Denton was being honored with the film’s premier. (Not exactly true, as I discover now. More like the Texas premier.) We’re accompanied by our mother, who as I recall had to talk her way past the usher, given the film’s R rating for its violence, extreme by the standards of the day. But when the grisly finale arrived, for us and for the ill-fated pair, my mother suddenly pressed our heads into her lap, to spare us the traumatizing spectacle. After all these years, I can come clean: I peeked long enough to see Bonnie and Clyde’s bodies flopping around under the machine-gun fire of Texas Rangers and various other overlapping law-enforcement jurisdictions.

Madison, Wisconsin, 1971 or 1972, watching Diamonds Are Forever with a friend. In those days, the intervals between each glamorous, sexy, exciting Bond movie seemed excruciatingly long, and the joy of finally getting to see the latest one was intense. But Diamonds Are Forever marked a growing up for me, at least in terms of cinematic sensibility. It was maybe the first time I could see that a movie wasn’t something that instantaneously bursts into being, fully formed and perfect. It was something crafted by imperfect human beings. As I watched my beloved Sean Connery, the only real James Bond, now sporting a bald spot, as he acted out a gunfight on a yacht or something, I realized that he was…bored. And so was I.

Madison, Wisconsin, 1974 (?), Amarcord. I first saw this movie as a teenager one summer, in the little movie theater in the University of Wisconsin student union. It is Federico Fellini’s fantastic reimagining of his adolescence in the small Adriatic coast town of Rimini in the 1930’s. I saw it a couple of years later with a group of friends in college—I remember the girls in our company laughing when the main character’s crazy uncle climbs a tree and cries out to the world, “I want a woman!,” a scene which, at that point in my life, didn’t seem so comical. I remember watching it in the spring of 1978 in East Berlin. I’ve watched it countless times over the years, and as I have grown and changed, the film has deepened and shown me different things—about being a kid, about being stuck in a mediocre school, about desire, about marriage, about fascism and resisting fascism, about losing a parent, about growing up (or not). I have a warm spot in my heart for Giuseppe Tornatore’s later Cinema Paradiso, which covers much of the same thematic territory, but Fellini’s less sentimental, more imaginative treatment made a personal connection with me. It’s an Italian The Last Picture Show, though what the town loses in the end is not its only movie theater, but the glamorous prostitute every man and boy in town is in love with. She attains her happy ending by marrying a stuffed shirt in a crisp black fascist uniform.

Hyde Park, Chicago, 1982. I am sitting in Hyde Park’s only movie theater, waiting for Mr. Mom to start.  I’m pretty sure it’s going to be lousy, but I want to see a movie, any movie. Then a trailer comes on for a science fiction story, like nothing I’ve ever seen before. Its future world is neither the standard desolate smoking post-apocalyptic ruin nor the standard gleaming antiseptic space station. It’s an utterly fantastic yet utterly believable squalid, overcrowded, dirty, dripping, urban landscape peopled by a deceptive mix of humans and androids, lit up by gigantic floating animated billboards that promise an idyllic life on suburban planets. I want to see this movie so bad it hurts. But it will be weeks before I get to see Blade Runner. And then I remember, with a sinking heart, that I am here to watch Mr. Mom.

Taipei, 1989 (?), A City of Sadness. Did you ever walk into a movie theater without any particular expectations, and leave feeling that you had just been a part of history? In Taiwan to visit in-laws, my wife and I went to see A City of Sadness. The title meant nothing to me. It turned out to be director Hou Hsiao-hsien’s understated masterpiece about the oppression and cruelties suffered by the people of Taiwan after World War II. The movie had recently premiered and the theater was standing room only. The film was both a cause and an effect of a turning point in Taiwanese society, as the people felt freer to express themselves and to openly examine the recent past. Forty years of martial law had ended only the year before. I don’t know why the film was shown with English subtitles, but luckily for me, it was.

Banff, 1998, Armageddon and Saving Private Ryan. We’re in Banff to escape the Texas summer heat. On two consecutive nights we watch Armageddon (forgettable) and Saving Private Ryan (memorable) in the town’s movie theater. Later it occurs to me that we’re in a Canadian town, and the only two movies showing are both about Americans sacrificing themselves to save the world.

Skokie, Illinois, 2001 (?) The Royal Tenenbaums. My wife and I go to visit my grandmother, who is dying from cancer. She has some trouble expressing herself, but makes it clear she’d really like to go see a movie. So we and other family members take her to see The Royal Tenenbaums, which seems to be the best cinematic offering at the moment. It was probably the last movie she saw, certainly the last one in a movie theater. And the movie?…Well, she deserved better.

Austin, Texas 2002 (?), Spirited Away. My wife and I went to see this animated masterpiece at night, based on a capsule review I read somewhere, maybe in the weekend entertainment page of something we called “the newspaper.” I had never heard of the Japanese director Hayao Miyazaki or seen any of his works. The theater was completely empty except for the two of us. We were treated to an exquisitely beautiful, dreamlike experience, the story of a child cut off from her parents and lost in an enormous bathhouse for spirits. It was so wonderful that we watched it again two or three nights later, again in an abandoned theater, which only enhanced the dreamlike experience.

A few years later the film returned for another tour, and we went to see it again. This time the place was packed with fans, many of them in costume.

Austin, Texas, 2002, The Sum of All Fears. It bugs me no end when people make noise during a movie, whether it’s talking, whispering, tearing open a maddeningly crackly plastic cover off a piece of candy, or rummaging around in a bucket of popcorn (unless it’s me doing the rummaging). How rare it is to sit in a perfectly quiet theater. But there are some moments of silence I remember.

 One such moment happened during The Sum of All Fears, which I watched with my wife in an Austin multiplex. A forgettable thriller, though it did break one convention of the genre: halfway through the story, the good guys are unable to reach the nuclear device before it goes off and completely destroys a city (Baltimore, in this case). At that point the theater went dead silent for several long seconds. Everyone was thinking of 9/11.

Short Story: The Prison Director’s Wife (Matilde Serao, 1889)

Matilde Serao, from: The Italy of the Italians, by Helen Zimmern (1909). In the public domain

Matilde Serao (1856-1927) came from a distinguished, if not wealthy, family. Her father was a Neapolitan lawyer and patriot, exiled to Greece from 1848 until the fall of the Bourbon dynasty in 1860. Her mother was a descendant of several Greek noble families. Young Matilde was trained as a schoolteacher, and worked in the Italian telegraph service before becoming a fulltime writer. In her long life she was a prolific journalist, columnist, short story writer and novelist, and a groundbreaking publisher and editor. She also led a dramatic personal life. When her husband’s mistress left her newborn child at their doorstep before shooting herself, Matilde adopted the baby girl, naming her Eleonora in honor of her friend, the actress Eleonora Duse.

This story, which I have titled “The Prison Director’s Wife,” is actually my translation of an excerpt from Serao’s novella, All’erta, Sentinella! (On Alert, Sentinel!, 1889). It is set on the island of Nisida, just off the coast of Naples. This island still houses a working prison. —Steve Eaton

Photo of Nisida in the 1930’s. Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons, in the public domain

From Stand Guard, Sentinel by Matilde Serao, (translation copyright (c) Steve Eaton, 2025)

….The convicts would look the prison director in the face anxiously, imploring leniency, knowing her husband to be the best of men, cold but gentle, severe but never cruel, and in their eyes she read threats, fury. Oh! Nothing could persuade her that those men had lost the taste for blood, nothing would convince her they weren’t hiding a knife up their sleeves! She didn’t leave her little boy with Grazietta, ever: it always seemed to her that out of revenge for being imprisoned, from the bestial desire for blood, out of murderous instinct, that one day one of those killers would kill him. She would go out, carrying him in her arms like a humble working-class mother, without feeling tired. And when she passed some convict, she would drop her gaze. They would greet her, taking off their caps, stopping to look at the handsome little child, obeying the kind paternal instinct which lies in the heart of the most wicked. One whom she always encountered on the road was a tall, robust young man, with a pale face, quite feminine blue eyes, and red hair.  She always ran into him, this man who wore the red cap of a convict imprisoned for life. It was almost as if he were waiting for her, the young mother with a baby. And when he saw her pass he would look, and look, this tall convict with tender eyes, he would look, standing still, until she reached a turn in that long road. Passing time might lessen her terror, but never overcome it. Frail and pensive, she tried to overcome her depression with sweetness, and her husband always found an affectionate, patient wife at home. She was ashamed of revealing her disgust, ashamed of her fear. She was afraid that these were a reproof of the good generous man who had lifted her, yes, out of poverty, out of an uncertain future, only to throw her into a prison. Sometimes he glimpsed this sense of repulsion, and she would try to suppress it, pained by a vague sense of remorse. And so his wife’s heart closed up, as if suffocating.

Only sometimes was she assailed by a sense of remorse. In truth, she was a very good person, piously devoted to her duties, compassionate towards all the afflicted, and when she managed to conquer her revulsion, her fear, she scolded herself for her own injustice, her own cruelty. The convicts were human beings too, and sometimes her fair-minded husband, so severe with them, would gently tell her this truth: they were men, and Christian, perhaps more unfortunate than guilty. And full of pain and penitence, Cecilia made up her mind to calmly tolerate their gaze when she went for walks on the island, and to greet them when they took off their caps. Just barely, though, just barely! If, on the grassy brow of a meadow where she set down her little boy to pull daisies from the ground, and where she fell bewitched at the sight of the great expanse of sea, while every so often Mario happily shrieked at finding an insect; if, in this oblivion of a dream, a man in brick-red clothes suddenly appeared, laboriously dragging a heavy chain, she would suppress a cry of fear, torn abruptly from her peace, from her dreams, turning pale as though in mortal danger, quickly picking up the little boy, taking him away. And that countryside, that sea, those flowers, that landscape, suddenly infected by the presence of a killer, incited in her a horror. What to do? It was stronger than her. But in her husband’s presence she repressed these feelings, as much as she could. She felt unappreciative, as if she were indirectly insulting him. She venerated him as the very embodiment of goodness and justice, but she was a poor, weak woman, without courage, imprisoned, locked up on that island, in that place of shame, of pain, of punishment, where the terrible company spoiled everything—the place and the house, her love as a bride and as a mother.

But on that particular day she was filled with remorse, more than ever. She’d been ungrateful towards her husband, almost throwing his generosity back at him. He had spoken to her without severity, but seriously. He was so much better than her! Her burning, precious tears, tears of penitence, bathed the little boy’s neck. Familiar with his mother’s occasional outbursts, this frail and melancholy little child caressed her face with his cool little hands, repeating softly, “Don’t cry, mama, don’t cry, mama.”

“No, I’m not crying,” she would say, drying her eyes, getting up. “Now your mama’s going to take her Mario for a walk.”

“In the carriage, mama, in the carriage,” shouted the boy, hanging onto Cecelia’s dress.

“Yes, son, in the carriage,” she replied, repressing a sigh.

There was a crude baby carriage, haphazardly built by those convict carpenters and blacksmiths, more iron than wood, which clanked like the chains they wore, attached to their ankles and belts. It was heavy and hard to push, always about to fall apart. When little Mario was in it, he was so happy that he never wanted to be taken out. He was thin and a bit weak-limbed, happy to lie down on those cushions which the mother had re-stuffed herself, to make them soft. He was happy to be taken around in the carriage, closing his eyes, dozing off in the felt cap that kept his ears warm. His frail mother would tire out after a while, but the little boy would immediately wake up and shout, “Push, mama, push!”

“One moment, Mario,” she would say, breathing hard.

And she stayed leaning on the iron handlebar, resting. But the boy would immediately start up again, in a pleading voice, “Push, mama, push, please, please.” And she would resume the walk, without a sigh. She would never have dared to send Mario on a walk in the carriage, with only Grazietta the housemaid, and it was impossible for both of them to go; there was housework to be done, and she was even vaguely afraid of leaving the house unattended. And so that day she had the heavy baby carriage brought up the steps in front of the door. The little boy jumped in happily, and sat down with a sense of delight. His mother put on a hat and gloves; she’d thrown a cover over the boy’s knees. Grazietta, the forty-year-old maid, silently watched.

“Gennaro Campanile is coming to put in the bookcase,” said her mistress, with emphasis. “Watch him, watch him.”

The housemaid smiled faintly; she was familiar with her mistress’ terrors. This Grazietta was the wife of a convict, a man who’d gotten into a fight and killed someone. Unquestioningly faithful to him, she’d followed him everywhere, from the Portolongone prison to Ischia, from Ischia, here to Nisida, doing the impossible by finding domestic work on each island, and oddly succeeding each time by a miracle of will and obstinance. Whatever she earned went to her husband. Thus, two big portions of her daily food would go to her husband. This sacrifice was performed in silence, almost secretly, such was her fear of being sent away from the island. Her husband, a stocky, fierce-looking man, would cautiously approach the iron-barred kitchen gate, and carry away a covered plate with bread, with fruit, and go off to some nook to wolf it down. She would come back inside, quite happy with her quasi-fast, and when her mistress involuntarily let slip her fear of convicts, Grazietta shook her head, like a woman of experience, convinced that the murderers are unlucky instead of guilty, convinced that such a misfortune could happen to anyone.

“Where do you want to go,” said the mother to her son, before setting out.

“There, there,” said the little boy, pointing ahead.

Nisida’s streets were as wide as those of a small city, with unpaved sidewalks, shaded here and there by acacias that were still green in October. The houses, inhabited by workers, suppliers, foremen, jailers, one story, two stories, had the gracious air of small, well-crafted country nests; the main edifice of the prison, dormitories, refectories, workshops, walkways, infirmaries, prison cells, stood in the middle, tall and dark, like a rock hanging over all those cottages. Every so often, at a turn in the road that belted Nisida, you could see, between the houses and the trees, the distant sparkling sea, a fresh, smiling vision. The little boy, lying in his carriage, opened his eyes wide, almost laughing, vaguely murmuring, “There…there….”

His mother pushed the baby carriage slowly, overcome by weariness, by a lassitude that came from an overworked, excitable nature. She mechanically greeted some of the employees’ wives, some of the suppliers’ daughters, the six or seven ladies who lived on the island along with the officers’ wives, while steadily slowing down, also looking at the sea, her child’s recurring dream. Every so often a soldier passed by, or a convict, one of those who circulated freely. She responded to their greeting, nodding her head slightly; the little boy, smiling, waved his hand. But at some point weariness defeated her; she had to let go of the carriage handle and sit down on a stone bench, pale, almost fainting. It was a half-deserted place, where the houses stopped and the countryside of Nisida began. The boy looked at his mother, her whitened face, her half-closed eyes. A bit intimidated, a bit frightened, he barely dared to murmur, “Push…mama, push.”

“In…a minute,” she said, in a voice so low it was only a breath, and her son didn’t hear.

“Your Excellency, I can push the carriage,” said a voice, masculine, but humble. Where had that convict with a white face and soft blue eyes come from, so suddenly? What was he asking, what did he want? She looked at him, stunned, confused, as if he were a vision.

“The little sprout’s heavy,” murmured the convict more humbly, “the carriage too. Your Excellency, I can push it.”

Then, she understood. Turning pale again, with pursed lips, she said, “no.”

“It’s not work for your hands. Let me carry him, the little sprout.”

“No,” she said again, getting angry.

“Excuse me, excuse my insistence. I’d be able to carry him, the little sprout, without getting tired. Don’t be afraid.” He finished speaking, with such tenderness that his voice seemed full of tears.

“I’m not afraid of anything,” she said curtly, getting up. “But I don’t want you to carry ‘the little sprout’.”

She stood up resolutely and began to push the carriage again, with heroic strength. He opened his arms wide; the chain hanging from his belt clanked in a sinister way, but he remained silent, watching mother and child move away. She was still trembling with anger, as if insulted by the very humility with which the convict had offered his services. Now they were in the open countryside, on a path between the meadows where the horses of two or three officers would come to graze, and those that pulled the carts used to bring up supplies from the beach.

“Mama,” said the boy thoughtfully.

“What do you want?”

“Why did you say no to that convict?”

“Because.”

The little boy fell silent, sensing the disturbance in his mother’s voice.

“You’re getting tired from pushing the carriage,” he observed after a while.

“No, darling.”

“Pick me up, mama, let me out.”

“Stay, dear, stay. Let’s go further, I’ll rest further on.”

They went a little further, in silence. They had already passed two or three sentry boxes. The child always looked at the soldiers, smiling at them.

“Mama,” said the child.

“What do you want, darling?”

“That convict wanted to carry me around, a long way, right?”

“Yes, yes.”

“He’s a poor fellow.”

“Who told you that?”

“Papa said it,” he responded triumphantly.

She bowed her head without answering.

“Are the soldiers poor fellows too, mama?” asked the child, after giving it some thought.

“The soldiers are gentleman,” she answered immediately.

“I see,” said the little boy. “The convicts are poor fellows and the soldiers are gentleman. What am I, mama? ‘The little sprout.’”

“My dear, dear little son,” she said, tenderly hugging and kissing him.

They’d reached a field all green, all fresh, all in bloom. A waist-high wall separated it from the one beside it. The mother stopped, overcome with fatigue, and dropped down to sit on the grass. The little boy looked at the grass and the flowers and the sea, as if thinking, thinking too much, too seriously, for his age. A strong odor of roses was in the air, those four-season roses that sprout in a day, intensely alive for just one day, along with the odor of mint, the wild herb found all over Nisida. Cecilia felt recovered from her fatigue, while the little boy almost dozed off in the carriage.

“Such a perfume of flowers,” she said, as if to herself.

Flowers there were, in that field, but there had to be more in the one beyond the wall. Had a vegetable garden been put in there, perhaps? Curious, she stood up. First she marveled, then felt shocked, as the spectacle unfolded, first sad, then terrible.

It was a wide, sloping field. It was poorly enclosed by a brick wall, here and there collapsed into a mound of rubble, eaten by the grass taking root in it, corroded by rain, battered by the wind, in short a pitiful defense that no longer resisted the passage of men or animals and perhaps no longer marked the boundary of the field. The grass grew in uneven clumps, on ground bizarrely uneven; a ground that swelled here, dipped there, like the waves of an angry sea. Among the grass grew bunches of four-season roses, beyond which the summer poppies were withering, leaving on their slender stalks the black and brittle pouches of sleep-inducing seeds. A sharp odor of wild herbs, of wild roses: the violent perfume of abandoned fields, where no one’s been for months or years, where the vegetation grows rank, expanding on its own, dying and reborn, wilting again, free, forgotten, abandoned, perhaps cursed. Fascinated, Cecilia looked, searching closely, and more closely, wanting to divine the mystery of that field bizarrely in motion, like the waves of the sea, surrounded by a wall but abandoned by men. She saw; she saw that here and there, in four or five places in the abandoned field, stood a small cross of blackened wood, which time had discolored and twisted; on the crosses, on some of them, was a yellowed placard, dirty, on which there were large, wobbly, handwritten characters, two initials and a number, the one the dead man wore in life, the number that man’s justice had given him in place of his name. The crosses seemed to be randomly scattered, as if by a caprice of the wind or man’s neglect. Maybe, once fallen over, found lying on the ground, they had been replanted by chance, where the body it was supposed to shield with its sacred little shadow no longer existed.

But Cecilia kept looking, as if a presentiment of unknown grief, of terror told her there was something more to see. And yes, focusing her gaze, she saw, she saw distinctly, among the yellowish earth and green grass, bleaching like a piece of old ivory, some human bones. Poorly buried, poorly covered by earth, in their splitting caskets, from the natural movement of the sprouting earth, from the natural, terrible movement of decomposition, the dead were emerging again from the earth, and their white bones were being washed by the rain; the white bones of the dead were shining in the sun. The graveyard of the convicts had no caretakers. Beside the fragrant growths of wild mint, among the wide four-season roses with their falling petals, these strange human shoots were sprouting. No merciful hoe returned them to the earth. They appeared here and there, there was one everywhere, so insistent that they seemed to have violently dug up the earth, so overwhelming that the frightened eye was almost afraid of seeing the entire skeleton outlined and then emerging from the ground. Cecilia looked wide-eyed at this horrendous crop of death, this retribution by the world which punishes even after death, which grants to the corpse of a killer not even the mercy of a deep grave, not even the care given to any other body, not even a final rest to bones which have shed their flesh. The graveyard of the convicts didn’t even have the services of a convict gardener. The bodies were flung down in haste, between four disjointed planks, and no one came to tend, to pray. The dead were emerging, as if a last, sharp hunger for freedom remained in the bones of these forced laborers. Along with grievous pity, a horrible vision came to Cecilia in that solitude, a vision of herself, her husband, her baby, buried in that field which seemed cursed by God and men, buried without pity or care, among the wild vegetation, on that soil battered by sun and wind, a vision of three abandoned corpses, rising again, lifting their bones to the light amid those of the thieves and murderers. And a high-pitched scream of grief, of fear formed in her breast, but, strangled, did not escape, and she dropped, leaden, by the wall, her face in the grass.

When she came to and opened her eyes, all she heard above the great silence was just a rustling. Her child was still lying in the carriage, but he’d opened his eyes and was smiling, smiling with his eyes and his lips at that convict, big, tall, with his red hair and white face. Lying on the ground, he was waving a broad grape leaf over the boy’s face, to keep him cool, to keep the flies away. As the grape leaf passed over him, the little boy would close and open his eyes, laughing silently. Twice, looking at his mother, stretched out, he’d said, “Shh! Mama’s sleeping.”

And the convict waved the big grape leaf over the boy’s face more slowly, to avoid making noise. That great body, dressed in reddish canvas, lying in the grass, looked like that of a colossus, friendly and childlike. Further away, among the flowers, he’d tossed the red cap that bore his number, 417. It looked like a poppy, a big late-blooming poppy.

On awakening, Cecelia felt nothing except a great weakness. Leaning on her elbow, she looked at her son and the convict, without anger, without fear. Rocco Traetta got to his feet, and stood there embarrassed, rolling the grape leaf between his fingers. The memory of what she had seen came back in its entirety, but without frightening her. Only a light shiver passed over her skin.

“Let’s go,” she said, getting up.

And in a gentle manner she pointed out the baby carriage to Rocco. He quickly picked up his cap and started to push the carriage, happily. She followed behind, weakly, letting herself be led, defeated, broken.


Steve Eaton is a literary translator residing in Austin. His translations of the novels A Conspiracy of Talkers (Gaetano Savatteri, 2000, translation, 2021) and The Priest’s Hat by Emilio De Marchi (1887, translation, 2023) are available in Kindle and paperback editions. His translations of other stories by 19th and 20th century Italian writers can be read for free on the Corylus Press website and on the online Stories for a Year project of the Pirandello Society of America.

A Silly Old Story

Is there a recognized genre of short stories about a duel? If so it would surely include Pushkin’s “The Shot” (1831) and Joseph Conrad’s “The Duel” (1908), both of which you, as discriminating readers of high-toned columns such as this one, are obviously familiar with. It should also include however a lesser-known tale titled “Storiella vecchia” (1882) or, “A Silly Old Story,” by the Italian author Gerolamo Rovetta. We have translated this delightful story into English and made it available for free on the Corylus Press website to subscribers and readers of this blog.* After you enjoy it, you can explore other stories on the Corylus Press website, translations of Italian authors by me and original works by my brother, the novelist Jonathan Eaton. Artwork by Jonathan.


* and anyone else

So Now What?

The unthinkable has become reality. The world’s sole democratic superpower has put a man in charge who is dangerously vindictive and dangerously stupid.

Dangerously vindictive, because he eagerly uses the awesome political, economic and military powers of the United States government to settle personal scores, and because almost any innocuous word or deed is enough to make someone a target. 

Dangerously stupid, because this man is incompetent at anything other than generating effective self-glorifying propaganda, a skill for which he has no peer. It might not be so bad, were he to surround himself with experienced, intelligent public servants. Instead we see the likes of Laura Loomer, an outright paranoid lunatic, determining which national intelligence experts to keep and whom to fire.

The damage is real and will be long-lasting. Our scientific and public health institutions are being gutted and taken over by people who don’t believe in science. Our economy is in freefall. Arab Americans who were justifiably upset at Joe Biden for standing up to Putin while failing to oppose Benjamin Netanyahu’s atrocities in Gaza now find that both Ukraine and the Palestinians are being left to twist slowly in the wind. Trump counts his disastrous tariffs as a success because panic-stricken governments all over the world are begging him for mercy. But whom can we go to?

And on, and on. And we’re not even a hundred days into this four-year nightmare. Or possibly longer, since Trump has been speculating out loud about a third, illegal term in office.

So now what?

The moderate conservative David Brooks counsels us to use calm, reasoned persuasion to gradually turn the MAGA masses against Trump, rather than just entertaining each other with outrage that never makes it out of the liberal echo-chamber.

All right, but how? I’ve been counselling my fellow Americans about Trump on this site since 2019, when I stated why I’m against The Wall. This blog is open for all the world to see, and I would love to have readers from across the ideological spectrum. But I have no illusions that anyone reads this who is not already of my approximate point of view. Why read anything that questions your worldview when there are a thousand sites that will confirm it? And I’m not brave enough to stick my neck out by floating a reasoned, fact-based opinion on some ultra-conservative website. I don’t like the idea of SWAT teams at my front door. And back door. And also the windows.

Occasionally I spy on Fox News’ website to see if there are any cracks in the Trump idolatry, caused by the collapsing economy, gutted social welfare institutions, etc. But, no such luck. Fox News still leads with gleeful accounts of Trump triumphs and liberals getting smacked down, usually followed down the page with a mug shot of a dangerous-looking young black man with bad hair. Good luck finding any hint of a doubt of Trump or his policies.

So now what?

I don’t have any brilliant ideas for saving this country I love. I think the hordes in funny red hats are just going to have to find out the hard way that Donald Trump does not love them, does not care about them, and doesn’t know what he is doing. Eventually they will discover that he has made their lives more insecure, less safe, less free, sicker and, except for a tiny number of oligarchs, poorer than they were before.  But I am not optimistic that this realization will happen any time soon, given the human mind’s tendency to believe what it wants to believe, and the Internet’s capacity to feed any belief at all,

So now what?

Here are my suggestions, for what to do in the meantime:

Firstly, continue to talk, post, scream, shout, and sing about what is going on. Don’t ever give in to the temptation to treat the new horror as the new normal.

Secondly, love thy neighbor, even, and especially, the ones in the funny red hats. Keep the lines of communication open and the easy insults at a minimum. Talk about Trump and all the awful things he is doing (see: “Firstly”), but don’t play their hate game. That changes nothing and is bad for your blood pressure.

Thirdly, live your life. Take a trip to the coast. Have a fresh bagel with lox and a shmear and capers and sweet onion. A glass of Montepulciano. Or two. Watch a movie and read a book (but not at the same time, please!). Shut off this device and go for a walk. We owe it to ourselves, our loved ones, and our country to stay happy and healthy while this shitshow works itself out.