Never Again, or Again and Again?

The time is long past to argue over the semantics of terms like “ethnic cleansing” and “genocide.”

You can call what is happening now in Gaza by whatever term pleases you. The terminology doesn’t change the fact that the Israeli Defense Forces, under the leadership of Benjamin Netanyahu, are herding the Palestinian population back and forth within the narrow borders of the Gaza Strip, as they turn entire cities, hospitals, schools, and apartment buildings included, to rubble. Forty or fifty thousand people have already been killed. Aid–food, water, medicine–has been shut off and children are starving and dying of preventable diseases.

And all of this is carried out under the now ludicrously phony aim of “getting the hostages back.” Netanyahu is now speaking of an even more aggressive ground campaign, with military occupation to follow. He seems to lack either the desire or the intellectual capacity to formulate any course of action other than inflicting more death and suffering on the Palestinian people, using all the 21st-century weapons and technology at his disposal.

This is becoming one of Western civilization’s great atrocities. It will be compared by historians to events like the massacre of Armenians by Turkey in 1915–with the difference that this time, it is being carried out by a close ally of the United States, and with the whole revolting spectacle graphically exposed to the world, day after day. But the historical perspective is no consolation to Palestinian parents watching their child starve to death, or to a Palestinian child whose parents lie under the rubble of an apartment building.

Every Israeli, every Jew, every Christian, every American, every human being with eyes and a heart should be appalled at what is happening in Gaza at the moment. It is absolutely wrong. And it is unnecessary. The IDF’s current strategy has no plausible rationale other than to keep Benjamin Netanyahu in power, out of jail, and to forestall the consequences of his own corruption and his security forces’ bungled handling of the horrific October 7, 2023 attack by Hamas on Israeli civilians.

A permanent, just solution aside, Israel can pull out of Gaza now, let humanitarian aid and humanitarian workers in, use its abundant military and logistical resources to seal off its border with Gaza, and employ its vaunted intelligence services to keep an eye on Hamas and to continue to pick off its leadership, without blowing up entire hospitals and residential communities.

What Israel is doing is wrong, and no accusations of antisemitism or anti-Zionism, whether valid or self-serving, make it right. The United States should use all of its economic and diplomatic resources to make Israel stop. And we the American people must make it politically unfeasible for our government to do anything else.

10 Memorable Movie (Going) Moments

I’m going to share ten personally memorable movie experiences of mine with you today…though not all of these movies were themselves memorable. If you have a movie memory you’d like to share, please leave it in the comments.

It’s 1967. I’m eight years old, sitting in one of Denton, Texas’ two single-screen movie theaters, watching A Guide for the Married Man, starring Walter Matthau and Robert Morse. It was probably some mediocre Hollywood producer’s idea of a smart, racy sex comedy. I can think of no reason I would have been sitting there, other than it was a hot summer afternoon, and that was what was playing.

It was an awful movie, but it was also memorable—literally, since I clearly remember two things about it, half a century later.

First: in a movie that was essentially a series of sketches, I can remember only one scene: Walter Matthau, as the wise old lecher, is instructing a naïve young Robert Morse on what to do if he’s caught having an affair: “deny, deny, deny,” no matter how much smoke the gun is emitting. Then we see Matthau’s character at home in bed with a girlfriend, as his wife unexpectedly returns home and catches them in the act. As the wife tears into the husband, the girl calmly gets up and starts to get dressed, and Matthau starts making the bed. He doesn’t understand why his wife is upset…nothing’s going on. The girl? What girl? The girlfriend gets her purse and leaves. Matthau continues to patiently deny everything and finishes making the bed. Finally the wife looks at her placid husband and the spotless bedroom, hesitates…and then admits that maybe she just dreamed the whole thing. As a cinematic illustration of “gaslighting,” it surpasses even Gaslight.

Secondly, and more importantly, I was struck by the funky, infectious theme song, written by John Williams and performed by The Turtles. It was stuck in my head for the next fifty years. It took the development of something called The Internet before I got to listen to that song a second time, and…it still rocks.

Still Denton,1967. My little brother and I are watching Bonnie and Clyde, the romanticized, revisionist version of the bank robbers’ story, starring Warren Beatty and Faye Dunaway. It‘s a big event: the real Bonnie and Clyde had committed some of their robberies and murders in and around Denton, and the film itself was shot partly in the vicinity. Denton was being honored with the film’s premier. (Not exactly true, as I discover now. More like the Texas premier.) We’re accompanied by our mother, who as I recall had to talk her way past the usher, given the film’s R rating for its violence, extreme by the standards of the day. But when the grisly finale arrived, for us and for the ill-fated pair, my mother suddenly pressed our heads into her lap, to spare us the traumatizing spectacle. After all these years, I can come clean: I peeked long enough to see Bonnie and Clyde’s bodies flopping around under the machine-gun fire of Texas Rangers and various other overlapping law-enforcement jurisdictions.

Madison, Wisconsin, 1971 or 1972, watching Diamonds Are Forever with a friend. In those days, the intervals between each glamorous, sexy, exciting Bond movie seemed excruciatingly long, and the joy of finally getting to see the latest one was intense. But Diamonds Are Forever marked a growing up for me, at least in terms of cinematic sensibility. It was maybe the first time I could see that a movie wasn’t something that instantaneously bursts into being, fully formed and perfect. It was something crafted by imperfect human beings. As I watched my beloved Sean Connery, the only real James Bond, now sporting a bald spot, as he acted out a gunfight on a yacht or something, I realized that he was…bored. And so was I.

Madison, Wisconsin, 1974 (?), Amarcord. I first saw this movie as a teenager one summer, in the little movie theater in the University of Wisconsin student union. It is Federico Fellini’s fantastic reimagining of his adolescence in the small Adriatic coast town of Rimini in the 1930’s. I saw it a couple of years later with a group of friends in college—I remember the girls in our company laughing when the main character’s crazy uncle climbs a tree and cries out to the world, “I want a woman!,” a scene which, at that point in my life, didn’t seem so comical. I remember watching it in the spring of 1978 in East Berlin. I’ve watched it countless times over the years, and as I have grown and changed, the film has deepened and shown me different things—about being a kid, about being stuck in a mediocre school, about desire, about marriage, about fascism and resisting fascism, about losing a parent, about growing up (or not). I have a warm spot in my heart for Giuseppe Tornatore’s later Cinema Paradiso, which covers much of the same thematic territory, but Fellini’s less sentimental, more imaginative treatment made a personal connection with me. It’s an Italian The Last Picture Show, though what the town loses in the end is not its only movie theater, but the glamorous prostitute every man and boy in town is in love with. She attains her happy ending by marrying a stuffed shirt in a crisp black fascist uniform.

Hyde Park, Chicago, 1982. I am sitting in Hyde Park’s only movie theater, waiting for Mr. Mom to start.  I’m pretty sure it’s going to be lousy, but I want to see a movie, any movie. Then a trailer comes on for a science fiction story, like nothing I’ve ever seen before. Its future world is neither the standard desolate smoking post-apocalyptic ruin nor the standard gleaming antiseptic space station. It’s an utterly fantastic yet utterly believable squalid, overcrowded, dirty, dripping, urban landscape peopled by a deceptive mix of humans and androids, lit up by gigantic floating animated billboards that promise an idyllic life on suburban planets. I want to see this movie so bad it hurts. But it will be weeks before I get to see Blade Runner. And then I remember, with a sinking heart, that I am here to watch Mr. Mom.

Taipei, 1989 (?), A City of Sadness. Did you ever walk into a movie theater without any particular expectations, and leave feeling that you had just been a part of history? In Taiwan to visit in-laws, my wife and I went to see A City of Sadness. The title meant nothing to me. It turned out to be director Hou Hsiao-hsien’s understated masterpiece about the oppression and cruelties suffered by the people of Taiwan after World War II. The movie had recently premiered and the theater was standing room only. The film was both a cause and an effect of a turning point in Taiwanese society, as the people felt freer to express themselves and to openly examine the recent past. Forty years of martial law had ended only the year before. I don’t know why the film was shown with English subtitles, but luckily for me, it was.

Banff, 1998, Armageddon and Saving Private Ryan. We’re in Banff to escape the Texas summer heat. On two consecutive nights we watch Armageddon (forgettable) and Saving Private Ryan (memorable) in the town’s movie theater. Later it occurs to me that we’re in a Canadian town, and the only two movies showing are both about Americans sacrificing themselves to save the world.

Skokie, Illinois, 2001 (?) The Royal Tenenbaums. My wife and I go to visit my grandmother, who is dying from cancer. She has some trouble expressing herself, but makes it clear she’d really like to go see a movie. So we and other family members take her to see The Royal Tenenbaums, which seems to be the best cinematic offering at the moment. It was probably the last movie she saw, certainly the last one in a movie theater. And the movie?…Well, she deserved better.

Austin, Texas 2002 (?), Spirited Away. My wife and I went to see this animated masterpiece at night, based on a capsule review I read somewhere, maybe in the weekend entertainment page of something we called “the newspaper.” I had never heard of the Japanese director Hayao Miyazaki or seen any of his works. The theater was completely empty except for the two of us. We were treated to an exquisitely beautiful, dreamlike experience, the story of a child cut off from her parents and lost in an enormous bathhouse for spirits. It was so wonderful that we watched it again two or three nights later, again in an abandoned theater, which only enhanced the dreamlike experience.

A few years later the film returned for another tour, and we went to see it again. This time the place was packed with fans, many of them in costume.

Austin, Texas, 2002, The Sum of All Fears. It bugs me no end when people make noise during a movie, whether it’s talking, whispering, tearing open a maddeningly crackly plastic cover off a piece of candy, or rummaging around in a bucket of popcorn (unless it’s me doing the rummaging). How rare it is to sit in a perfectly quiet theater. But there are some moments of silence I remember.

 One such moment happened during The Sum of All Fears, which I watched with my wife in an Austin multiplex. A forgettable thriller, though it did break one convention of the genre: halfway through the story, the good guys are unable to reach the nuclear device before it goes off and completely destroys a city (Baltimore, in this case). At that point the theater went dead silent for several long seconds. Everyone was thinking of 9/11.

Short Story: The Prison Director’s Wife (Matilde Serao, 1889)

Matilde Serao, from: The Italy of the Italians, by Helen Zimmern (1909). In the public domain

Matilde Serao (1856-1927) came from a distinguished, if not wealthy, family. Her father was a Neapolitan lawyer and patriot, exiled to Greece from 1848 until the fall of the Bourbon dynasty in 1860. Her mother was a descendant of several Greek noble families. Young Matilde was trained as a schoolteacher, and worked in the Italian telegraph service before becoming a fulltime writer. In her long life she was a prolific journalist, columnist, short story writer and novelist, and a groundbreaking publisher and editor. She also led a dramatic personal life. When her husband’s mistress left her newborn child at their doorstep before shooting herself, Matilde adopted the baby girl, naming her Eleonora in honor of her friend, the actress Eleonora Duse.

This story, which I have titled “The Prison Director’s Wife,” is actually my translation of an excerpt from Serao’s novella, All’erta, Sentinella! (On Alert, Sentinel!, 1889). It is set on the island of Nisida, just off the coast of Naples. This island still houses a working prison. —Steve Eaton

Photo of Nisida in the 1930’s. Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons, in the public domain

From Stand Guard, Sentinel by Matilde Serao, (translation copyright (c) Steve Eaton, 2025)

….The convicts would look the prison director in the face anxiously, imploring leniency, knowing her husband to be the best of men, cold but gentle, severe but never cruel, and in their eyes she read threats, fury. Oh! Nothing could persuade her that those men had lost the taste for blood, nothing would convince her they weren’t hiding a knife up their sleeves! She didn’t leave her little boy with Grazietta, ever: it always seemed to her that out of revenge for being imprisoned, from the bestial desire for blood, out of murderous instinct, that one day one of those killers would kill him. She would go out, carrying him in her arms like a humble working-class mother, without feeling tired. And when she passed some convict, she would drop her gaze. They would greet her, taking off their caps, stopping to look at the handsome little child, obeying the kind paternal instinct which lies in the heart of the most wicked. One whom she always encountered on the road was a tall, robust young man, with a pale face, quite feminine blue eyes, and red hair.  She always ran into him, this man who wore the red cap of a convict imprisoned for life. It was almost as if he were waiting for her, the young mother with a baby. And when he saw her pass he would look, and look, this tall convict with tender eyes, he would look, standing still, until she reached a turn in that long road. Passing time might lessen her terror, but never overcome it. Frail and pensive, she tried to overcome her depression with sweetness, and her husband always found an affectionate, patient wife at home. She was ashamed of revealing her disgust, ashamed of her fear. She was afraid that these were a reproof of the good generous man who had lifted her, yes, out of poverty, out of an uncertain future, only to throw her into a prison. Sometimes he glimpsed this sense of repulsion, and she would try to suppress it, pained by a vague sense of remorse. And so his wife’s heart closed up, as if suffocating.

Only sometimes was she assailed by a sense of remorse. In truth, she was a very good person, piously devoted to her duties, compassionate towards all the afflicted, and when she managed to conquer her revulsion, her fear, she scolded herself for her own injustice, her own cruelty. The convicts were human beings too, and sometimes her fair-minded husband, so severe with them, would gently tell her this truth: they were men, and Christian, perhaps more unfortunate than guilty. And full of pain and penitence, Cecilia made up her mind to calmly tolerate their gaze when she went for walks on the island, and to greet them when they took off their caps. Just barely, though, just barely! If, on the grassy brow of a meadow where she set down her little boy to pull daisies from the ground, and where she fell bewitched at the sight of the great expanse of sea, while every so often Mario happily shrieked at finding an insect; if, in this oblivion of a dream, a man in brick-red clothes suddenly appeared, laboriously dragging a heavy chain, she would suppress a cry of fear, torn abruptly from her peace, from her dreams, turning pale as though in mortal danger, quickly picking up the little boy, taking him away. And that countryside, that sea, those flowers, that landscape, suddenly infected by the presence of a killer, incited in her a horror. What to do? It was stronger than her. But in her husband’s presence she repressed these feelings, as much as she could. She felt unappreciative, as if she were indirectly insulting him. She venerated him as the very embodiment of goodness and justice, but she was a poor, weak woman, without courage, imprisoned, locked up on that island, in that place of shame, of pain, of punishment, where the terrible company spoiled everything—the place and the house, her love as a bride and as a mother.

But on that particular day she was filled with remorse, more than ever. She’d been ungrateful towards her husband, almost throwing his generosity back at him. He had spoken to her without severity, but seriously. He was so much better than her! Her burning, precious tears, tears of penitence, bathed the little boy’s neck. Familiar with his mother’s occasional outbursts, this frail and melancholy little child caressed her face with his cool little hands, repeating softly, “Don’t cry, mama, don’t cry, mama.”

“No, I’m not crying,” she would say, drying her eyes, getting up. “Now your mama’s going to take her Mario for a walk.”

“In the carriage, mama, in the carriage,” shouted the boy, hanging onto Cecelia’s dress.

“Yes, son, in the carriage,” she replied, repressing a sigh.

There was a crude baby carriage, haphazardly built by those convict carpenters and blacksmiths, more iron than wood, which clanked like the chains they wore, attached to their ankles and belts. It was heavy and hard to push, always about to fall apart. When little Mario was in it, he was so happy that he never wanted to be taken out. He was thin and a bit weak-limbed, happy to lie down on those cushions which the mother had re-stuffed herself, to make them soft. He was happy to be taken around in the carriage, closing his eyes, dozing off in the felt cap that kept his ears warm. His frail mother would tire out after a while, but the little boy would immediately wake up and shout, “Push, mama, push!”

“One moment, Mario,” she would say, breathing hard.

And she stayed leaning on the iron handlebar, resting. But the boy would immediately start up again, in a pleading voice, “Push, mama, push, please, please.” And she would resume the walk, without a sigh. She would never have dared to send Mario on a walk in the carriage, with only Grazietta the housemaid, and it was impossible for both of them to go; there was housework to be done, and she was even vaguely afraid of leaving the house unattended. And so that day she had the heavy baby carriage brought up the steps in front of the door. The little boy jumped in happily, and sat down with a sense of delight. His mother put on a hat and gloves; she’d thrown a cover over the boy’s knees. Grazietta, the forty-year-old maid, silently watched.

“Gennaro Campanile is coming to put in the bookcase,” said her mistress, with emphasis. “Watch him, watch him.”

The housemaid smiled faintly; she was familiar with her mistress’ terrors. This Grazietta was the wife of a convict, a man who’d gotten into a fight and killed someone. Unquestioningly faithful to him, she’d followed him everywhere, from the Portolongone prison to Ischia, from Ischia, here to Nisida, doing the impossible by finding domestic work on each island, and oddly succeeding each time by a miracle of will and obstinance. Whatever she earned went to her husband. Thus, two big portions of her daily food would go to her husband. This sacrifice was performed in silence, almost secretly, such was her fear of being sent away from the island. Her husband, a stocky, fierce-looking man, would cautiously approach the iron-barred kitchen gate, and carry away a covered plate with bread, with fruit, and go off to some nook to wolf it down. She would come back inside, quite happy with her quasi-fast, and when her mistress involuntarily let slip her fear of convicts, Grazietta shook her head, like a woman of experience, convinced that the murderers are unlucky instead of guilty, convinced that such a misfortune could happen to anyone.

“Where do you want to go,” said the mother to her son, before setting out.

“There, there,” said the little boy, pointing ahead.

Nisida’s streets were as wide as those of a small city, with unpaved sidewalks, shaded here and there by acacias that were still green in October. The houses, inhabited by workers, suppliers, foremen, jailers, one story, two stories, had the gracious air of small, well-crafted country nests; the main edifice of the prison, dormitories, refectories, workshops, walkways, infirmaries, prison cells, stood in the middle, tall and dark, like a rock hanging over all those cottages. Every so often, at a turn in the road that belted Nisida, you could see, between the houses and the trees, the distant sparkling sea, a fresh, smiling vision. The little boy, lying in his carriage, opened his eyes wide, almost laughing, vaguely murmuring, “There…there….”

His mother pushed the baby carriage slowly, overcome by weariness, by a lassitude that came from an overworked, excitable nature. She mechanically greeted some of the employees’ wives, some of the suppliers’ daughters, the six or seven ladies who lived on the island along with the officers’ wives, while steadily slowing down, also looking at the sea, her child’s recurring dream. Every so often a soldier passed by, or a convict, one of those who circulated freely. She responded to their greeting, nodding her head slightly; the little boy, smiling, waved his hand. But at some point weariness defeated her; she had to let go of the carriage handle and sit down on a stone bench, pale, almost fainting. It was a half-deserted place, where the houses stopped and the countryside of Nisida began. The boy looked at his mother, her whitened face, her half-closed eyes. A bit intimidated, a bit frightened, he barely dared to murmur, “Push…mama, push.”

“In…a minute,” she said, in a voice so low it was only a breath, and her son didn’t hear.

“Your Excellency, I can push the carriage,” said a voice, masculine, but humble. Where had that convict with a white face and soft blue eyes come from, so suddenly? What was he asking, what did he want? She looked at him, stunned, confused, as if he were a vision.

“The little sprout’s heavy,” murmured the convict more humbly, “the carriage too. Your Excellency, I can push it.”

Then, she understood. Turning pale again, with pursed lips, she said, “no.”

“It’s not work for your hands. Let me carry him, the little sprout.”

“No,” she said again, getting angry.

“Excuse me, excuse my insistence. I’d be able to carry him, the little sprout, without getting tired. Don’t be afraid.” He finished speaking, with such tenderness that his voice seemed full of tears.

“I’m not afraid of anything,” she said curtly, getting up. “But I don’t want you to carry ‘the little sprout’.”

She stood up resolutely and began to push the carriage again, with heroic strength. He opened his arms wide; the chain hanging from his belt clanked in a sinister way, but he remained silent, watching mother and child move away. She was still trembling with anger, as if insulted by the very humility with which the convict had offered his services. Now they were in the open countryside, on a path between the meadows where the horses of two or three officers would come to graze, and those that pulled the carts used to bring up supplies from the beach.

“Mama,” said the boy thoughtfully.

“What do you want?”

“Why did you say no to that convict?”

“Because.”

The little boy fell silent, sensing the disturbance in his mother’s voice.

“You’re getting tired from pushing the carriage,” he observed after a while.

“No, darling.”

“Pick me up, mama, let me out.”

“Stay, dear, stay. Let’s go further, I’ll rest further on.”

They went a little further, in silence. They had already passed two or three sentry boxes. The child always looked at the soldiers, smiling at them.

“Mama,” said the child.

“What do you want, darling?”

“That convict wanted to carry me around, a long way, right?”

“Yes, yes.”

“He’s a poor fellow.”

“Who told you that?”

“Papa said it,” he responded triumphantly.

She bowed her head without answering.

“Are the soldiers poor fellows too, mama?” asked the child, after giving it some thought.

“The soldiers are gentleman,” she answered immediately.

“I see,” said the little boy. “The convicts are poor fellows and the soldiers are gentleman. What am I, mama? ‘The little sprout.’”

“My dear, dear little son,” she said, tenderly hugging and kissing him.

They’d reached a field all green, all fresh, all in bloom. A waist-high wall separated it from the one beside it. The mother stopped, overcome with fatigue, and dropped down to sit on the grass. The little boy looked at the grass and the flowers and the sea, as if thinking, thinking too much, too seriously, for his age. A strong odor of roses was in the air, those four-season roses that sprout in a day, intensely alive for just one day, along with the odor of mint, the wild herb found all over Nisida. Cecilia felt recovered from her fatigue, while the little boy almost dozed off in the carriage.

“Such a perfume of flowers,” she said, as if to herself.

Flowers there were, in that field, but there had to be more in the one beyond the wall. Had a vegetable garden been put in there, perhaps? Curious, she stood up. First she marveled, then felt shocked, as the spectacle unfolded, first sad, then terrible.

It was a wide, sloping field. It was poorly enclosed by a brick wall, here and there collapsed into a mound of rubble, eaten by the grass taking root in it, corroded by rain, battered by the wind, in short a pitiful defense that no longer resisted the passage of men or animals and perhaps no longer marked the boundary of the field. The grass grew in uneven clumps, on ground bizarrely uneven; a ground that swelled here, dipped there, like the waves of an angry sea. Among the grass grew bunches of four-season roses, beyond which the summer poppies were withering, leaving on their slender stalks the black and brittle pouches of sleep-inducing seeds. A sharp odor of wild herbs, of wild roses: the violent perfume of abandoned fields, where no one’s been for months or years, where the vegetation grows rank, expanding on its own, dying and reborn, wilting again, free, forgotten, abandoned, perhaps cursed. Fascinated, Cecilia looked, searching closely, and more closely, wanting to divine the mystery of that field bizarrely in motion, like the waves of the sea, surrounded by a wall but abandoned by men. She saw; she saw that here and there, in four or five places in the abandoned field, stood a small cross of blackened wood, which time had discolored and twisted; on the crosses, on some of them, was a yellowed placard, dirty, on which there were large, wobbly, handwritten characters, two initials and a number, the one the dead man wore in life, the number that man’s justice had given him in place of his name. The crosses seemed to be randomly scattered, as if by a caprice of the wind or man’s neglect. Maybe, once fallen over, found lying on the ground, they had been replanted by chance, where the body it was supposed to shield with its sacred little shadow no longer existed.

But Cecilia kept looking, as if a presentiment of unknown grief, of terror told her there was something more to see. And yes, focusing her gaze, she saw, she saw distinctly, among the yellowish earth and green grass, bleaching like a piece of old ivory, some human bones. Poorly buried, poorly covered by earth, in their splitting caskets, from the natural movement of the sprouting earth, from the natural, terrible movement of decomposition, the dead were emerging again from the earth, and their white bones were being washed by the rain; the white bones of the dead were shining in the sun. The graveyard of the convicts had no caretakers. Beside the fragrant growths of wild mint, among the wide four-season roses with their falling petals, these strange human shoots were sprouting. No merciful hoe returned them to the earth. They appeared here and there, there was one everywhere, so insistent that they seemed to have violently dug up the earth, so overwhelming that the frightened eye was almost afraid of seeing the entire skeleton outlined and then emerging from the ground. Cecilia looked wide-eyed at this horrendous crop of death, this retribution by the world which punishes even after death, which grants to the corpse of a killer not even the mercy of a deep grave, not even the care given to any other body, not even a final rest to bones which have shed their flesh. The graveyard of the convicts didn’t even have the services of a convict gardener. The bodies were flung down in haste, between four disjointed planks, and no one came to tend, to pray. The dead were emerging, as if a last, sharp hunger for freedom remained in the bones of these forced laborers. Along with grievous pity, a horrible vision came to Cecilia in that solitude, a vision of herself, her husband, her baby, buried in that field which seemed cursed by God and men, buried without pity or care, among the wild vegetation, on that soil battered by sun and wind, a vision of three abandoned corpses, rising again, lifting their bones to the light amid those of the thieves and murderers. And a high-pitched scream of grief, of fear formed in her breast, but, strangled, did not escape, and she dropped, leaden, by the wall, her face in the grass.

When she came to and opened her eyes, all she heard above the great silence was just a rustling. Her child was still lying in the carriage, but he’d opened his eyes and was smiling, smiling with his eyes and his lips at that convict, big, tall, with his red hair and white face. Lying on the ground, he was waving a broad grape leaf over the boy’s face, to keep him cool, to keep the flies away. As the grape leaf passed over him, the little boy would close and open his eyes, laughing silently. Twice, looking at his mother, stretched out, he’d said, “Shh! Mama’s sleeping.”

And the convict waved the big grape leaf over the boy’s face more slowly, to avoid making noise. That great body, dressed in reddish canvas, lying in the grass, looked like that of a colossus, friendly and childlike. Further away, among the flowers, he’d tossed the red cap that bore his number, 417. It looked like a poppy, a big late-blooming poppy.

On awakening, Cecelia felt nothing except a great weakness. Leaning on her elbow, she looked at her son and the convict, without anger, without fear. Rocco Traetta got to his feet, and stood there embarrassed, rolling the grape leaf between his fingers. The memory of what she had seen came back in its entirety, but without frightening her. Only a light shiver passed over her skin.

“Let’s go,” she said, getting up.

And in a gentle manner she pointed out the baby carriage to Rocco. He quickly picked up his cap and started to push the carriage, happily. She followed behind, weakly, letting herself be led, defeated, broken.


Steve Eaton is a literary translator residing in Austin. His translations of the novels A Conspiracy of Talkers (Gaetano Savatteri, 2000, translation, 2021) and The Priest’s Hat by Emilio De Marchi (1887, translation, 2023) are available in Kindle and paperback editions. His translations of other stories by 19th and 20th century Italian writers can be read for free on the Corylus Press website and on the online Stories for a Year project of the Pirandello Society of America.

A Silly Old Story

Is there a recognized genre of short stories about a duel? If so it would surely include Pushkin’s “The Shot” (1831) and Joseph Conrad’s “The Duel” (1908), both of which you, as discriminating readers of high-toned columns such as this one, are obviously familiar with. It should also include however a lesser-known tale titled “Storiella vecchia” (1882) or, “A Silly Old Story,” by the Italian author Gerolamo Rovetta. We have translated this delightful story into English and made it available for free on the Corylus Press website to subscribers and readers of this blog.* After you enjoy it, you can explore other stories on the Corylus Press website, translations of Italian authors by me and original works by my brother, the novelist Jonathan Eaton. Artwork by Jonathan.


* and anyone else

So Now What?

The unthinkable has become reality. The world’s sole democratic superpower has put a man in charge who is dangerously vindictive and dangerously stupid.

Dangerously vindictive, because he eagerly uses the awesome political, economic and military powers of the United States government to settle personal scores, and because almost any innocuous word or deed is enough to make someone a target. 

Dangerously stupid, because this man is incompetent at anything other than generating effective self-glorifying propaganda, a skill for which he has no peer. It might not be so bad, were he to surround himself with experienced, intelligent public servants. Instead we see the likes of Laura Loomer, an outright paranoid lunatic, determining which national intelligence experts to keep and whom to fire.

The damage is real and will be long-lasting. Our scientific and public health institutions are being gutted and taken over by people who don’t believe in science. Our economy is in freefall. Arab Americans who were justifiably upset at Joe Biden for standing up to Putin while failing to oppose Benjamin Netanyahu’s atrocities in Gaza now find that both Ukraine and the Palestinians are being left to twist slowly in the wind. Trump counts his disastrous tariffs as a success because panic-stricken governments all over the world are begging him for mercy. But whom can we go to?

And on, and on. And we’re not even a hundred days into this four-year nightmare. Or possibly longer, since Trump has been speculating out loud about a third, illegal term in office.

So now what?

The moderate conservative David Brooks counsels us to use calm, reasoned persuasion to gradually turn the MAGA masses against Trump, rather than just entertaining each other with outrage that never makes it out of the liberal echo-chamber.

All right, but how? I’ve been counselling my fellow Americans about Trump on this site since 2019, when I stated why I’m against The Wall. This blog is open for all the world to see, and I would love to have readers from across the ideological spectrum. But I have no illusions that anyone reads this who is not already of my approximate point of view. Why read anything that questions your worldview when there are a thousand sites that will confirm it? And I’m not brave enough to stick my neck out by floating a reasoned, fact-based opinion on some ultra-conservative website. I don’t like the idea of SWAT teams at my front door. And back door. And also the windows.

Occasionally I spy on Fox News’ website to see if there are any cracks in the Trump idolatry, caused by the collapsing economy, gutted social welfare institutions, etc. But, no such luck. Fox News still leads with gleeful accounts of Trump triumphs and liberals getting smacked down, usually followed down the page with a mug shot of a dangerous-looking young black man with bad hair. Good luck finding any hint of a doubt of Trump or his policies.

So now what?

I don’t have any brilliant ideas for saving this country I love. I think the hordes in funny red hats are just going to have to find out the hard way that Donald Trump does not love them, does not care about them, and doesn’t know what he is doing. Eventually they will discover that he has made their lives more insecure, less safe, less free, sicker and, except for a tiny number of oligarchs, poorer than they were before.  But I am not optimistic that this realization will happen any time soon, given the human mind’s tendency to believe what it wants to believe, and the Internet’s capacity to feed any belief at all,

So now what?

Here are my suggestions, for what to do in the meantime:

Firstly, continue to talk, post, scream, shout, and sing about what is going on. Don’t ever give in to the temptation to treat the new horror as the new normal.

Secondly, love thy neighbor, even, and especially, the ones in the funny red hats. Keep the lines of communication open and the easy insults at a minimum. Talk about Trump and all the awful things he is doing (see: “Firstly”), but don’t play their hate game. That changes nothing and is bad for your blood pressure.

Thirdly, live your life. Take a trip to the coast. Have a fresh bagel with lox and a shmear and capers and sweet onion. A glass of Montepulciano. Or two. Watch a movie and read a book (but not at the same time, please!). Shut off this device and go for a walk. We owe it to ourselves, our loved ones, and our country to stay happy and healthy while this shitshow works itself out.

What Can You Get For $25 Million These Days?

Twenty-five million dollars. Twenty-five million clams. Twenty-five million smackers. Twenty five million simoleons.

What can you get for 25 million dollars?

Well, about 50 million of those high-priced eggs (using the new “egg surcharge” of $.50 at my local diner as a guide).

Or, you could hire about 350 public school teachers for a year.

Or, you could get about 200,000 children vaccinated for measles, at the typical out-of-pocket drugstore rate of $125.

Or, you could fund full-boat, four-year scholarships for 166 students at an average-priced college.

Or, you could buy about 15 powerful, long-range ATACMS missiles for Ukraine to use in destroying Vladimir Putin’s command centers, ammunition dumps, and fuel depots.

Or, using the World Bank’s figure of about $4.00 per, you could adequately feed 6,250,000 people for a day.

But one thing you cannot buy for $25 million dollars, apparently, is a seat on the Wisconsin State Supreme Court, as Elon Musk discovered last night.

Not that it’s much of a loss for Musk. According to Forbes’ magazine, the WORM (WOrld’s Richest Man) is worth about 340 billion dollars. That makes the 25 mil substantially less than 1/100th of 1 percent of his treasure. But we’ll round it up to that.

To put that in terms that ordinary, like, human beings can understand: suppose you are a relatively well-off late-career professional or recent retiree, with $1 million in assets. It would be as if you wasted $100—the price of a fancy-ish steak dinner for two—on a losing candidate’s campaign fund.

Still, 25 mil is 25 mil. And it’s an interesting question as to why it wasn’t enough to propel candidate Brad Schimel, a standard-issue abortion opposing, Affordable Care Act resisting, Trump adoring conservative, to victory. And this, in the state of U.S. Senator Ron “no exceptions for rape or incest” Johnson and recent union-busting governor Scott Walker.

Could it be that Musk’s millions actually lost Schimel the election? I like to think so. My theory is that many of the farm and factory voters of the great state of Wisconsin who personally related to Trump, found the grotesquely wealthy chainsaw-waving, fascist-saluting, government-employee-destroying tech bro just too repulsive, and that repulsion rubbed off on Schimel. And I find a crumb of comfort in the knowledge that at least Musk has $25 million less to spend in making the world a darker place.

And maybe we’ll treat ourselves to a steak dinner this weekend. I know for a fact that the money will be well spent.

On the New Police State

We are now living in a police state. That should be evident to anyone who has seen the video footage of the recent arrest of a woman by Immigration and Customs Enforcements (ICE) officers. You can see the video on YouTube. That clip should horrify all of us, liberal, conservative, Democrat, Republican, progressive, or MAGA.

In the video we see what appears to be an ordinary woman walking down a city street, alone, looking at her phone. She is stopped at first by one, and then several figures. Most of them are dressed in black from head to foot, and their faces are covered. She screams in fear, but in a few seconds she is surrounded, handcuffed and led to a big black SUV. She has since been whisked away to somewhere in Louisiana.

I have a lot of questions about this arrest and the way it was carried out. Why was this person taken on the street, by surprise? Was ICE afraid of a shootout if they knocked on the door at her home or office? Were they afraid she might set off a bomb if they didn’t ambush her? Why didn’t they just notify her by mail and give her a chance to find a lawyer and turn herself in? Was she some sort of international criminal ringleader who might slip away to a secret hideout? Beyond all that, what crime was she suspected of committing?

The woman being taken to the waiting SUV is a graduate student of Child Study and Human Development at Tufts University, named Rumeysa Öztürk. She is a legal resident, a citizen of our NATO ally Turkey. She has committed no crime. Ms. Öztürk was arrested as part of President Donald Trump’s phony war on anti-Semitism.  According to ICE, Öztürk “engaged in activities in support of Hamas, a foreign terrorist organization that relishes the killing of Americans.”

The idea that Öztürk is a Hamas sympathizer apparently originates in a rightwing vigilante website called Canary Mission, which in turn based its claim on an article Öztürk co-authored in the Tufts student newspaper last year. That article bears the incendiary headline, “Try again, President Kumar: Renewing calls for Tufts to adopt March 4 TCU [Tufts Community Union] Senate resolutions.”

The article makes a reasoned argument for Tufts to take a principled stand and to adopt the recommendations of its own faculty, staff, and student body to oppose Israeli military actions in the Gaza strip against Palestinian civilians. You may or may not agree with the article’s characterization of what the Israeli Defense Forces are doing to Palestinians. But I challenge you to read the editorial yourself and find in it an iota of antisemitism—or for that matter, an iota of hatred or prejudice against anyone. It makes no direct or indirect reference to Hamas.

But we are living in an authoritarian police state, and unfortunately for Ms. Öztürk, she embodies the confluence of several of its made-up demons: an immigrant, an intellectual, and a Palestinian sympathizer.

Don’t just take it from me. As the prominent Holocaust scholar Christopher Browning, professor emeritus of history at the University of North Carolina and author of The Origins of the Final Solution, concludes his essay in the current issue of the New York Review of Books, “Trump, Antisemitism & Academia”

It is utterly contradictory but hardly surprising for Trump to feign indignation over the harassment of Jewish students while openly advocating criminal violence against Palestinians. His campaign against campus antisemitism is simply a hypocritical pretext for his assault on American higher education.

This is shameful, and we should call it for what it is: state-sponsored terrorism.

On The Big Lie(s)

Imagine two husbands who are cheating on their wives and regularly staying out until dawn.

The first husband, whether out of guilt, self-interest, or a misplaced sense of decorum, does his best to devise credible lies to cover up his actions. He had to work late to catch up on a critical project. He was at Frank’s house playing poker with the guys all night, honest! Go ahead, ask Frank! Now, where can I take you for dinner tonight?

The first husband’s wife eventually figures out it’s all a lie, but she pretends to believe him, at least for a while.

The second husband doesn’t even make a pretense of credibility. Instead, his lies absurdly turn the tables on his poor wife and make her the villain. He’s not cheating, she is, the slut! And she better apologize immediately, or she might end up on the street. After giving back her ring!

And the second husband’s wife, whether out of self-interest or plain fear, apologizes, begs for forgiveness, and promises to sever her relationship with her best friend Mona, that lying bitch who told her she saw her husband with Melissa last night at the Tiki Lounge.

The first husband’s behavior loosely describes George W. Bush, who told the American public in 2002 that Iraq’s dictator Saddam Hussein (A) was a perpetrator of the 9/11 massacre of American citizens and (B) was preparing nuclear and (C) chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction in order to commit further atrocities against Americans. He backed up these assertions with “evidence,” including some grainy satellite photos of RVs or something in the desert, and testimony by some guy codenamed “Curveball.” This evidence was convincing enough to get Bush’s sober, honorable Secretary of State, the decorated veteran Colin Powell, to take it before the United Nations and use it to make a case for war.

Remember the aluminum tubes? The “yellowcake”? Anthrax labs? The pre-9/11 meeting in Prague? I’m ashamed to admit that, at the time, I believed that something must be going on in Iraq.

And the evidence was enough for our congress, who overwhelmingly passed a resolution authorizing the war.

After we went to war, we discovered too late that the “evidence” was all a lie. An ex-post-thousands-of-dead-facto justification for the war was that Hussein was a brutal dictator—true enough, but not the reason we were given to start with. I’ve literally grown old hoping for Bush to just admit that he made a horrible mistake.

Why am I writing this? It feels like poking myself with a needle. God, I miss Jimmy Carter.

But at least Bush respected us enough to construct a credible story. Donald Trump’s behavior is exemplified by the second husband. He doesn’t even try to concoct evidence. He doesn’t need to, doesn’t really care whether you believe him or not. He just fantasizes about what he would most like to be true, and then declares it as fact, from the anecdotal (immigrants in Ohio are stealing and cooking America’s beloved pets; little boys are going to school in the morning and coming home in the afternoon as little girls) to the global (Vladimir Zelensky is a dictator, Ukraine started the war against Russia, Panama is ripping off American shippers on behalf of China).

And the Republican Party is like that second husband’s wife, pretending to believe him. Or maybe they actually do. As long as they act like they believe him, there’s no practical difference.

Editorial plea: if you enjoy these posts, please do us a favor: share them and invite other smart people to join the tiny elite cabal of Garden residents. They can find the subscribe link here.  

The End of Parody

If you’ve followed my bloggy offerings for any length of time, you know that I have feasted on our past and present president as a rich comedic source for the past nine years or so. For example, I considered how a Satan presidency would stack up against Trump’s (Satan comes out ahead in terms of experience and basic human decency); what a Trump State of the Union Address from a New York State prison might look like (in the “wishful thinking” category); and a revelation that the sensational “Anonymous” source leaking White House insider info to the media was actually Trump himself, vainly trying to satisfy his bottomless need for attention.

Given current headlines, it looks like our Commander-in-Chief will remain a rich source of material for as long as he remains in office. But the fun part of making fun of his hjinks is gone, for two reasons.

Firstly, I have come to realize that I cannot outdo Trump himself in parodying Trump. Consider that a fundamental device in political humor is the “take-it-to-the-logical-extreme” approach. For example, Trump has loudly speculated about the United States’ right to annex Greenland, so I wrote a recent blog in which Trump threatens to nuke Stockholm, er, Copenhagen, and if that doesn’t work, to impose tariffs.

What of it? I am writing about a man who once gave a press conference in which he suggested trying bleach injections and sunlamps as a cure for the COVID virus. A man who quite recently proposed forcibly and permanently evacuating the two million inhabitants of the Gaza Strip so that he could transform it into a luxury resort. A convicted felon who referred to the convicted thugs who violently assaulted the U.S. Capitol building in 2021 as “hostages” and gave each one a pardon or commutation. How can I out-ridicule a man who is already a walking parody of decency, statesmanship, and public service? I’m a pretty cynical guy, ready to think the worst about the present administration. Yet it never occurred to me to call those monsters “hostages.” Well done, Mr. President!

The second problem is more serious. Political humor these days has started to feel pointless, self-indulgent, even counter-productive. When I watch the master Jon Stewart doing his show before a studio audience that hoots and howls in approval, I have a sinking feeling that we’re just indulging in emotional self-gratification that makes no real difference to anyone. And it’s not even that gratifying anymore.

Meanwhile, there is real blood on the carpet. Trump is outlining proposals for the disposition of the Gaza Strip that would have been too appalling for even Benjamin Netanyahu to propose in public. Human beings guilty of nothing more than lacking proper paperwork are being rounded up and sent on flying prison buses out of the country. Guantanamo Bay is being converted to a concentration camp. Government officers in charge of financial and judicial integrity are being fired or forced to resign. Programs to encourage the development of wind and solar power are being pointlessly scrapped—pointlessly, unless you’re an oil company stockholder. NATO….

But why go on? I can keep on making jokes about it, but it looks like the joke is on us, the American people, in fact, the entire human race.

Maybe one day soon, when cracking a joke or drawing a disrespectful cartoon can get you sent to prison or worse, then political satire will be a meaningful act again. Til then…maybe I’ll start posting recipes. “The One Wrong Thing Everyone Does With Bolognese Sauce!”

Dead Center (Nel segno, Luigi Pirandello, 1904)

If you know anything about Luigi Pirandello (1867-1936), it’s probably because you’ve heard of his play, Six Characters in Search of an Author (1921), about a family of fictional characters pleading with a theater director to stage their story, after their author has abandoned them.

But Pirandello was the author of numerous important novels, plays, and more than 250 short stories. A handful of his stories were translated into English and have been included in world-literature anthologies for decades; many others have not been translated.

Two Pirandello scholars, Lisa Sarti and Michael Subialka, have been leading a project to solicit and publish translations of every one of his stories from various literary translators, and to make these translations freely available online. I am grateful to both of them for allowing me to contribute.

My translation of Pirandello’s story “Dead Center” (“Nel segno”) was recently posted on their “Stories for a Year” site, along with an excellent introduction by the editors, and you can read it here–as well as find links to many other Pirandello stories.

My thanks again to Lisa Sarti and Michael Subialka, as well as to the Pirandello scholar Daniela Bini, whose early encouragement and advice did much to set me on the literary translation path.

Effective Immediately: Some Executive Orders We’d Like to See

Trump Keeps Up Breakneck Pace of Executive Orders: New York Times, 1/29/25

Effective Immediately: All McDonald’s restaurants in the U.S. will be renamed “McKamala’s.”

Effective Immediately: All illegal immigrants currently residing in the U.S. will receive a cute little sack containing a packet of Gummi Bears, a Starbucks gift card, U.S. citizenship, and a brochure entitled, “What is a Payroll Tax?”

Effective Immediately: All January 6th rioters will be required to display a prominent scarlet “A” on their tactical camouflage vests. It does not stand for “American.” Or “Adulterer.”

Effective Immediately: Federal funds will be released to enable authors of impertinent little blogs like this one to lead a life of creative ease.

Effective Immediately: The Justice Department is instructed to launch an investigation into why we have to sit through a zillion obnoxious ads before listening to or watching anything the least bit interesting.

Effective Immediately: Nothing is effective immediately. Sometime next week is fine.

ICE STATION ZEBRA II: FROSTED DANISH

Trump Alarms Denmark in an Icy Exchange Over Greenland—Headline, The New York Times, Jan. 26 2025

SCENE: White House, the Oval Office

KRISTI NOEM, Dept. of Homeland Security: It’s Denmark, sir. They appear to be moving forces towards Greenland.

POTUS: Those backstabbing Danians! I told you they were going to invade!

MARCO RUBIO, SECRETARY OF STATE: Technically, sir, it’s not an invasion, since Denmark is actually responsible for the defense of Greenland, which is….

POTUS: No way! Shut up!

RUBIO: I’m totally serious!

POTUS: So am I! Shut up!

KASH PATEL, FBI DIRECTOR: Should I arrest him now, sir?

POTUS: Not yet, just take away his Secret Services.

PATEL: I would, but the Secret Service actually belongs to Treasury, not….

POTUS: Shut up!

PATEL: Yes sir! Should I arrest myself now, sir?

POTUS: I never cared for those Denmarkians. Who wants their stupid pastries anyway! We can make danishes right here in America, and make them ten times better!

RUBIO: Umm…

POTUS: Umm, what?

RUBIO: Nothing, sir. Brilliant insight, sir.

POTUS: Kristi, we need the Secretary of Defense on this. Go wake up Pete Hegseth!

NOEM: He’s right over there on the couch, sir, next to the empty bottles.

POTUS: So wake him up! [Kristi Noem gives Pete Hegseth a good shake]

PETER HEGSETH, U.S. Secretary of Defense: What th’, where am I? [sees Noem] Oh hello, darlin’! How about you grab your .22 and we’ll jump in the old pickup truck and go looking for some misbehavin’ Malamoots!

POTUS: It’s the Danishes we need to focus on now, Pete! What kind of military are we up against?

HEGSETH: Well let’s see now, they got almost a hundred warfighters. I like to say ‘warfighters’ instead of ‘soldiers’ cause it sounds sexier! And some of them are actually female, which is totally wrong but kind of hot! Just thinkin’ about them Danish girl warfighters, I start to get…

POTUS: What about their navy?

HEGSETH: Well sir, our intelligence indicates they recently took an old herring boat and mounted a blunderbuss on the fo’c’sle. [Cue ominous music] We have drones operating in the area now to help us determine what a blunderbuss is. And also a fo’c’sle.

POTUS: Armor?

HEGSETH: We believe they are equipped with at least two tanks. One is on permanent display outside a museum in Vestervig. The other one is…currently unaccounted for. [Cue ominous music]

POTUS: [Squinting fiercely] My God, Pete…that tank could be on the herring boat right now…headed for the Gulf of America!

TULSI GABBARD, NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE DIRECTOR: Mr. President, we just received information that China is launching an invasion of Taiwan. I told them OK but please let us know next time.

POTUS: So sad. China would never have invaded if I were president of Taiwan! Now about those Denmarkers…We’re going to nuke the hell out of Stockholm!

RUBIO: Copenhagen.

POTUS: And also Copenhagen! And if that doesn’t work, they can expect 20% tariffs!